DESIGNING OUT UNWANTED HEALTHCARE FUTURES: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR HEALTHCARE DESIGN INNOVATION WITH INTENT

Anna Wojdecka, A. Hall, Tibor Balint
{"title":"DESIGNING OUT UNWANTED HEALTHCARE FUTURES: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR HEALTHCARE DESIGN INNOVATION WITH INTENT","authors":"Anna Wojdecka, A. Hall, Tibor Balint","doi":"10.35199/epde.2022.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the time of a global pandemic, it is becoming acutely evident that design has to intensify efforts to move beyond reactive tackling of healthcare challenges as they occur, towards a proactive approach of designing-out unwanted healthcare futures before they become a reality. As healthcare design navigates towards more distant horizons, the scale and magnitude of design challenges increase. New approaches to envisioning and negotiating preferable healthcare futures across disciplines are required in order to make that shift successful. In this paper, we discuss the application of a new trans-disciplinary approach applied within burst-mode healthcare design education of professionals from multidisciplinary backgrounds. This strategic design-led innovation approach distinguishes between desirable and undesirable futures. It employs futures scoping methods, alongside the identification of technology drivers and enablers, to understand the target landscape and to design strategic pathways toward paving design interventions. Tools, such as the four futures of Jim Dator and NASA TRLs, are used alongside collaborative mood boarding to visualise possible futures and facilitate concept generation utilising moon-shot thinking and back casting.","PeriodicalId":147286,"journal":{"name":"DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2022.110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the time of a global pandemic, it is becoming acutely evident that design has to intensify efforts to move beyond reactive tackling of healthcare challenges as they occur, towards a proactive approach of designing-out unwanted healthcare futures before they become a reality. As healthcare design navigates towards more distant horizons, the scale and magnitude of design challenges increase. New approaches to envisioning and negotiating preferable healthcare futures across disciplines are required in order to make that shift successful. In this paper, we discuss the application of a new trans-disciplinary approach applied within burst-mode healthcare design education of professionals from multidisciplinary backgrounds. This strategic design-led innovation approach distinguishes between desirable and undesirable futures. It employs futures scoping methods, alongside the identification of technology drivers and enablers, to understand the target landscape and to design strategic pathways toward paving design interventions. Tools, such as the four futures of Jim Dator and NASA TRLs, are used alongside collaborative mood boarding to visualise possible futures and facilitate concept generation utilising moon-shot thinking and back casting.
设计出不想要的医疗保健未来:医疗保健设计创新的新框架
在全球大流行的时期,越来越明显的是,设计必须加大努力,超越在医疗保健挑战发生时被动应对,而是采取主动的方法,在不受欢迎的医疗保健未来成为现实之前设计出来。随着医疗保健设计走向更遥远的视野,设计挑战的规模和幅度也在增加。为了使这一转变取得成功,需要采用新的方法来设想和谈判跨学科的更可取的医疗保健未来。在本文中,我们讨论了一种新的跨学科方法在多学科背景的专业人员的突发模式医疗保健设计教育中的应用。这种以设计为主导的战略创新方法区分了理想和不理想的未来。它采用未来范围界定方法,以及识别技术驱动因素和推动者,以了解目标景观,并为铺平设计干预设计设计战略路径。工具,如Jim Dator和NASA trl的四个未来,与协作情绪板一起使用,以可视化可能的未来,并利用登月思维和回溯铸造促进概念生成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信