On Presburger arithmetic extended with non-unary counting quantifiers

P. Habermehl, D. Kuske
{"title":"On Presburger arithmetic extended with non-unary counting quantifiers","authors":"P. Habermehl, D. Kuske","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2204.03903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider a first-order logic for the integers with addition. This logic\nextends classical first-order logic by modulo-counting, threshold-counting and\nexact-counting quantifiers, all applied to tuples of variables (here, residues\nare given as terms while moduli and thresholds are given explicitly). Our main\nresult shows that satisfaction for this logic is decidable in two-fold\nexponential space. If only threshold- and exact-counting quantifiers are\nallowed, we prove an upper bound of alternating two-fold exponential time with\nlinearly many alternations. This latter result almost matches Berman's exact\ncomplexity of first-order logic without counting quantifiers.\n To obtain these results, we first translate threshold- and exact-counting\nquantifiers into classical first-order logic in polynomial time (which already\nproves the second result). To handle the remaining modulo-counting quantifiers\nfor tuples, we first reduce them in doubly exponential time to modulo-counting\nquantifiers for single elements. For these quantifiers, we provide a quantifier\nelimination procedure similar to Reddy and Loveland's procedure for first-order\nlogic and analyse the growth of coefficients, constants, and moduli appearing\nin this process. The bounds obtained this way allow to restrict quantification\nin the original formula to integers of bounded size which then implies the\nfirst result mentioned above.\n Our logic is incomparable with the logic considered by Chistikov et al. in\n2022. They allow more general counting operations in quantifiers, but only\nunary quantifiers. The move from unary to non-unary quantifiers is non-trivial,\nsince, e.g., the non-unary version of the H\\\"artig quantifier results in an\nundecidable theory.","PeriodicalId":314387,"journal":{"name":"Log. Methods Comput. Sci.","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Log. Methods Comput. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.03903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We consider a first-order logic for the integers with addition. This logic extends classical first-order logic by modulo-counting, threshold-counting and exact-counting quantifiers, all applied to tuples of variables (here, residues are given as terms while moduli and thresholds are given explicitly). Our main result shows that satisfaction for this logic is decidable in two-fold exponential space. If only threshold- and exact-counting quantifiers are allowed, we prove an upper bound of alternating two-fold exponential time with linearly many alternations. This latter result almost matches Berman's exact complexity of first-order logic without counting quantifiers. To obtain these results, we first translate threshold- and exact-counting quantifiers into classical first-order logic in polynomial time (which already proves the second result). To handle the remaining modulo-counting quantifiers for tuples, we first reduce them in doubly exponential time to modulo-counting quantifiers for single elements. For these quantifiers, we provide a quantifier elimination procedure similar to Reddy and Loveland's procedure for first-order logic and analyse the growth of coefficients, constants, and moduli appearing in this process. The bounds obtained this way allow to restrict quantification in the original formula to integers of bounded size which then implies the first result mentioned above. Our logic is incomparable with the logic considered by Chistikov et al. in 2022. They allow more general counting operations in quantifiers, but only unary quantifiers. The move from unary to non-unary quantifiers is non-trivial, since, e.g., the non-unary version of the H\"artig quantifier results in an undecidable theory.
非一元计数量词扩展的Presburger算术
我们考虑带有加法的整数的一阶逻辑。这个逻辑通过模计数、阈值计数和精确计数量词扩展了经典的一阶逻辑,所有这些量词都应用于变量的元组(这里,残差作为项给出,而模和阈值则显式给出)。我们的主要结果表明,该逻辑的满足在二重指数空间中是可判定的。如果只允许阈值计数量词和精确计数量词,我们证明了具有线性多次变化的交替两倍指数时间的上界。后一种结果几乎与伯曼在不计算量词的情况下的一阶逻辑的精确复杂性相匹配。为了获得这些结果,我们首先在多项式时间内将阈值计数和精确计数量词转换为经典一阶逻辑(这已经证明了第二个结果)。为了处理元组的剩余模计数量词,我们首先在双指数时间内将它们简化为单个元素的模计数量词。对于这些量词,我们提供了一种类似于Reddy和Loveland一阶逻辑的量词消去过程,并分析了在此过程中出现的系数、常数和模的增长。用这种方法得到的界允许将原公式中的量化限制为有界大小的整数,这就隐含了上面提到的第一个结果。我们的逻辑与Chistikov等人在2022年所考虑的逻辑是无法比拟的。它们允许在量词中进行更一般的计数操作,但仅限于一元量词。从一元量词到非一元量词的转变是非平凡的,因为,例如,H\ ' artig量词的非一元版本导致不可判定的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信