Some aspects of setting up the technical regulation system in the design and construction industry in the transition to a design parametric approach.

D. Isaenko, V. Ploskyi, V. Skochko
{"title":"Some aspects of setting up the technical regulation system in the design and construction industry in the transition to a design parametric approach.","authors":"D. Isaenko, V. Ploskyi, V. Skochko","doi":"10.32557/USEFUL-3-1-2019-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper proposes an approach to the identification and elimination of conflicts of technical regulation parameters contained in the normative and technical documentation of the design and construction industry. The approach is based on comparing the complexity of the methods of defining the same parameters of technical regulation in various normative documents, followed by an analysis of the validity of only one of the studied methods. It is proposed to apply a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the associated parameters of technical regulation, which are involved in various investigated techniques and regulatory documents, in order to identify the depth of integration of one or another of them in the actual practice of design and construction work. If one or more of the techniques under consideration are less substantiated from a scientific, qualitative and/or quantitative point of view, then it (they) is (are) subject to withdrawal from the relevant normative documents with the provision of appropriate recommendations and references to that normative document, which is accepted as the main one for determining the investigated parameter of technical regulation. After removing unnecessary parameters (duplicated to optimization), all editable regulatory documents should be subjected to expert advice to supplement and provide guidance on the use of other existing normative documents related to the data when determining the specific parameter of technical regulation. In addition, expert opinion will help to avoid possible shortcomings in the narrative of normative documentation, as well as prevent the loss of some important part of descriptive information and simplified approaches to an approximate assessment of the investigated parameters of technical regulation, which can be used for integrated assessment calculations, the execution of project documentation at the stage of sketch design and pre-design works.","PeriodicalId":118526,"journal":{"name":"USEFUL online journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"USEFUL online journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32557/USEFUL-3-1-2019-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper proposes an approach to the identification and elimination of conflicts of technical regulation parameters contained in the normative and technical documentation of the design and construction industry. The approach is based on comparing the complexity of the methods of defining the same parameters of technical regulation in various normative documents, followed by an analysis of the validity of only one of the studied methods. It is proposed to apply a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the associated parameters of technical regulation, which are involved in various investigated techniques and regulatory documents, in order to identify the depth of integration of one or another of them in the actual practice of design and construction work. If one or more of the techniques under consideration are less substantiated from a scientific, qualitative and/or quantitative point of view, then it (they) is (are) subject to withdrawal from the relevant normative documents with the provision of appropriate recommendations and references to that normative document, which is accepted as the main one for determining the investigated parameter of technical regulation. After removing unnecessary parameters (duplicated to optimization), all editable regulatory documents should be subjected to expert advice to supplement and provide guidance on the use of other existing normative documents related to the data when determining the specific parameter of technical regulation. In addition, expert opinion will help to avoid possible shortcomings in the narrative of normative documentation, as well as prevent the loss of some important part of descriptive information and simplified approaches to an approximate assessment of the investigated parameters of technical regulation, which can be used for integrated assessment calculations, the execution of project documentation at the stage of sketch design and pre-design works.
在向设计参数化方法过渡的过程中,建立设计施工行业技术规范体系的几个方面。
本文提出了一种识别和消除设计和建筑行业规范和技术文件中包含的技术法规参数冲突的方法。该方法是基于比较各种规范性文件中定义相同技术法规参数的方法的复杂性,然后分析其中一种研究方法的有效性。建议对各种被调查的技术和法规文件中涉及的技术法规的相关参数进行定量和定性分析,以便确定其中一个或另一个在设计和施工工作的实际实践中的整合深度。如果考虑中的一项或多项技术从科学、定性和/或定量的角度来看证据不足,则可以将其从相关的规范性文件中删除,并提供适当的建议和参考该规范性文件,该规范性文件被接受为确定所调查的技术法规参数的主要标准。在剔除不必要的参数(重复优化)后,所有可编辑的规范性文件都应征求专家意见,以便在确定技术法规的具体参数时,对与该数据相关的其他现有规范性文件的使用进行补充和指导。此外,专家意见将有助于避免规范性文件叙述中可能出现的缺点,并防止描述性信息的某些重要部分的丢失,以及对所调查的技术法规参数进行近似评估的简化方法,这些方法可用于综合评估计算、在草图设计阶段执行项目文件和设计前工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信