Effects of Replacing Breadcrumbs with Buckwheat, Chickpea, Corn and Mil-let Flour in Gluten-Free Meatball Formulation

A. S. Babaoğlu
{"title":"Effects of Replacing Breadcrumbs with Buckwheat, Chickpea, Corn and Mil-let Flour in Gluten-Free Meatball Formulation","authors":"A. S. Babaoğlu","doi":"10.15316/sjafs.2022.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different gluten-free flours on the physicochemical, textural and sensory properties of meatballs. Five different groups of meatballs were produced: C: control meatballs with breadcrumbs, Gf1: meatballs with buckwheat flour, Gf2: meatballs with chickpea flour, Gf3: meatballs with corn flour and Gf4: meatballs with millet flour. The chickpea flour increased the protein content of raw meatballs (P < 0.05). The cooking yield results were higher in gluten-free meatballs than in control samples (P < 0.05). Chickpea flour (Gf2) and corn flour (Gf3) were the most effective flours for reducing the diameter of meatballs (P < 0.05). The highest antioxidant activity was found in the meatballs with buckwheat flour (Gf1) (P < 0.05). The chickpea flour improved the texture of the meatball samples (P < 0.05), while corn and millet flour increased the hardness and chewiness values of the meatballs (P < 0.05). Millet flour decreased the flavour score compared to the control (P < 0.05), whereas the other gluten-free flours had no significant effect on all sensory properties of the meatballs (P > 0.05). This study suggests that chickpea flour had a better effect on the quality characteristics of meatballs among gluten-free flours.\n","PeriodicalId":125980,"journal":{"name":"Selcuk Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Selcuk Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15316/sjafs.2022.052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different gluten-free flours on the physicochemical, textural and sensory properties of meatballs. Five different groups of meatballs were produced: C: control meatballs with breadcrumbs, Gf1: meatballs with buckwheat flour, Gf2: meatballs with chickpea flour, Gf3: meatballs with corn flour and Gf4: meatballs with millet flour. The chickpea flour increased the protein content of raw meatballs (P < 0.05). The cooking yield results were higher in gluten-free meatballs than in control samples (P < 0.05). Chickpea flour (Gf2) and corn flour (Gf3) were the most effective flours for reducing the diameter of meatballs (P < 0.05). The highest antioxidant activity was found in the meatballs with buckwheat flour (Gf1) (P < 0.05). The chickpea flour improved the texture of the meatball samples (P < 0.05), while corn and millet flour increased the hardness and chewiness values of the meatballs (P < 0.05). Millet flour decreased the flavour score compared to the control (P < 0.05), whereas the other gluten-free flours had no significant effect on all sensory properties of the meatballs (P > 0.05). This study suggests that chickpea flour had a better effect on the quality characteristics of meatballs among gluten-free flours.
荞麦、鹰嘴豆、玉米和米粉替代面包屑在无麸质肉丸配方中的效果
本研究的目的是评价不同的无麸质面粉对肉丸的物理化学,质地和感官特性的影响。制作了五组不同的肉丸:C:面包屑对照肉丸,Gf1:荞麦粉肉丸,Gf2:鹰嘴豆粉肉丸,Gf3:玉米粉肉丸,Gf4:小米粉肉丸。鹰嘴豆粉提高了生肉丸的蛋白质含量(P < 0.05)。无麸质肉丸的蒸煮得率显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。鹰嘴豆粉(Gf2)和玉米粉(Gf3)是减小肉丸直径最有效的面粉(P < 0.05)。添加荞麦粉的肉丸抗氧化活性最高(P < 0.05)。鹰嘴豆粉改善了肉丸样品的质地(P < 0.05),玉米粉和小米粉提高了肉丸的硬度和嚼劲值(P < 0.05)。与对照组相比,小米粉降低了肉丸的风味评分(P < 0.05),而其他无麸质面粉对肉丸的各项感官性能均无显著影响(P > 0.05)。本研究表明,鹰嘴豆粉对肉丸的品质特性影响较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信