The Effectiveness of Implementation and Compliance with ICCPR in the Case of Violations of the Right to Life and the Right to be Free from Tortured in Syria

Mentari Jastisia
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Implementation and Compliance with ICCPR in the Case of Violations of the Right to Life and the Right to be Free from Tortured in Syria","authors":"Mentari Jastisia","doi":"10.51825/tjil.v1i2.17433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The case of Syria is closely related to the civil and political rights of its citizens, the Syrian Government has violated the civil and political rights of its citizens, namely the violation of the right to life and the right to be free from torture. But as a member of the United Nations, Syria has ratified the ICCPR on 21 April 1969. ICCPR basically contains provisions on restrictions on use Authority by the state's repressive apparatus. The approach method used in this research is normative juridical which focuses on research on applicable legal provisions, namely on How’s the Effectiveness of Implementation and Compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) in the Case of Violations of the Right to Life and the Right to be free from tortured in Syria. The specification of this research is descriptive analysis by showing the lack of legal protection in the field of Syrian immigrants and then conducting an analysis with various related legal sources. Syria as a member country of the ICCPR has carried out its obligations by sending periodic reports on cases of civil and political rights violations in Syria that are likely to experience delays. Syria has not yet ratified Optional Protocol I, so Syria can not be adapted by other ICCPR member states on the rights and politics in Syria, nor can there be any individual complaints by the Syrians against cases of civil and political rights. The author also concludes that in view of recent cases in Syria, it can be said that it violates the provisions of Article 6 & 7 ICCPR.","PeriodicalId":302271,"journal":{"name":"Tirtayasa Journal of International Law","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tirtayasa Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51825/tjil.v1i2.17433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The case of Syria is closely related to the civil and political rights of its citizens, the Syrian Government has violated the civil and political rights of its citizens, namely the violation of the right to life and the right to be free from torture. But as a member of the United Nations, Syria has ratified the ICCPR on 21 April 1969. ICCPR basically contains provisions on restrictions on use Authority by the state's repressive apparatus. The approach method used in this research is normative juridical which focuses on research on applicable legal provisions, namely on How’s the Effectiveness of Implementation and Compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) in the Case of Violations of the Right to Life and the Right to be free from tortured in Syria. The specification of this research is descriptive analysis by showing the lack of legal protection in the field of Syrian immigrants and then conducting an analysis with various related legal sources. Syria as a member country of the ICCPR has carried out its obligations by sending periodic reports on cases of civil and political rights violations in Syria that are likely to experience delays. Syria has not yet ratified Optional Protocol I, so Syria can not be adapted by other ICCPR member states on the rights and politics in Syria, nor can there be any individual complaints by the Syrians against cases of civil and political rights. The author also concludes that in view of recent cases in Syria, it can be said that it violates the provisions of Article 6 & 7 ICCPR.
《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》在叙利亚侵犯生命权和免受酷刑权案件中的执行和遵守效果
叙利亚的情况与其公民的公民和政治权利密切相关,叙利亚政府侵犯了其公民的公民和政治权利,即侵犯了生命权和不受酷刑的权利。但作为联合国的一员,叙利亚于1969年4月21日批准了《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》。《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》基本上包含了限制国家镇压机器使用权力的规定。本研究使用的方法是规范司法方法,侧重于研究适用的法律规定,即在叙利亚侵犯生命权和免于酷刑权的情况下,《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》(ICCPR)的执行和遵守效果如何。本研究的具体内容是描述性分析,通过展示叙利亚移民领域缺乏法律保护,然后与各种相关法律来源进行分析。叙利亚作为《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》的成员国,履行了自己的义务,定期就叙利亚境内可能遭遇拖延的侵犯公民权利和政治权利的案件提交报告。叙利亚尚未批准《第一项任择议定书》,因此其他《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》成员国不能就叙利亚的权利和政治问题对叙利亚进行调整,叙利亚人也不能就公民权利和政治权利的案件提出任何个人申诉。提交人还得出结论说,鉴于最近在叙利亚发生的案件,可以说它违反了《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》第6和第7条的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信