A Retrospective Analysis of Plate Fixation of Humerus Fracture

Sunil Kumar Kirar, S. Upadhyay, S. Singh, A. Varshney
{"title":"A Retrospective Analysis of Plate Fixation of Humerus Fracture","authors":"Sunil Kumar Kirar, S. Upadhyay, S. Singh, A. Varshney","doi":"10.17511/IJOSO.2021.I02.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Humeral shaft fractures represent 1–3% of all the fractures coming in our OPD.These fractures are mostly treated conservatively. Both the plate fixation and nailing techniques arebeing used but plate fixation has the advantage of lesser rates of malunion and non-union. Ourstudy aimed to evaluate the results of plate fixation in our hospital that employs plate fixation as thegolden standard. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patientstreated for a humeral shaft fracture in our hospital (District Hospital Vidisha associated with ABVMedical College, Vidisha between July 2018 and June 2020 with a mean follow-up of 6 months.Results: Plate fixation was performed in 40 patients with a humeral shaft fracture. The mean agewas 50 (SD 20) years with 60 % (n = 24) being male. There were 55 % (n = 22) fractures in theright and 45 % (n =18) fractures in the left. None of the patients develops superficial surgical siteinfection. Complications like Radial Nerve palsy, Deep surgical site infections and Non-union occurredin 2.5 % (n = 1), 2.5 % (n = 1) and 5 % (n = 2) of patients, respectively. The median duration ofradiological fracture healing was 18 (range 10–42) weeks. Conclusion: Plate fixation for humeralshaft fractures has low risks of complications. The complications can be further minimized withgreater surgical expertise.","PeriodicalId":267909,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17511/IJOSO.2021.I02.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Humeral shaft fractures represent 1–3% of all the fractures coming in our OPD.These fractures are mostly treated conservatively. Both the plate fixation and nailing techniques arebeing used but plate fixation has the advantage of lesser rates of malunion and non-union. Ourstudy aimed to evaluate the results of plate fixation in our hospital that employs plate fixation as thegolden standard. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patientstreated for a humeral shaft fracture in our hospital (District Hospital Vidisha associated with ABVMedical College, Vidisha between July 2018 and June 2020 with a mean follow-up of 6 months.Results: Plate fixation was performed in 40 patients with a humeral shaft fracture. The mean agewas 50 (SD 20) years with 60 % (n = 24) being male. There were 55 % (n = 22) fractures in theright and 45 % (n =18) fractures in the left. None of the patients develops superficial surgical siteinfection. Complications like Radial Nerve palsy, Deep surgical site infections and Non-union occurredin 2.5 % (n = 1), 2.5 % (n = 1) and 5 % (n = 2) of patients, respectively. The median duration ofradiological fracture healing was 18 (range 10–42) weeks. Conclusion: Plate fixation for humeralshaft fractures has low risks of complications. The complications can be further minimized withgreater surgical expertise.
肱骨骨折钢板内固定的回顾性分析
肱骨轴骨折占我们门诊所有骨折的1-3%。这些骨折大多采用保守治疗。钢板内固定和骨钉内固定都被广泛使用,但钢板内固定的优点是骨折不愈合和不愈合的发生率较低。本研究旨在评价我院以钢板固定为金标准的钢板固定效果。材料与方法:本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入2018年7月至2020年6月在我院(维迪沙ABVMedical College附属维迪沙区医院)治疗的所有肱骨干骨折患者,平均随访6个月。结果:40例肱骨骨干骨折患者均行钢板内固定。平均年龄50岁(SD = 20),其中60% (n = 24)为男性。右侧骨折占55% (n = 22),左侧骨折占45% (n =18)。所有患者均未发生手术部位浅表感染。桡神经麻痹、深部手术部位感染、不愈合的发生率分别为2.5% (n = 1)、2.5% (n = 1)、5% (n = 2)。放射学骨折愈合的中位持续时间为18周(范围10-42周)。结论:钢板内固定治疗肱骨骨干骨折并发症发生率低。随着手术技术的提高,并发症可以进一步减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信