Double Reliability Evaluation of Intelligent Diagnostic Methods baesd on DGA

Xuelei Wang, Shuo Wang, Wenbing Zhu
{"title":"Double Reliability Evaluation of Intelligent Diagnostic Methods baesd on DGA","authors":"Xuelei Wang, Shuo Wang, Wenbing Zhu","doi":"10.1109/ITNEC.2019.8729079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the classical DGA fault diagnosis methods, their diagnostic characteristics information from different angles, such as gas concentration, gas ratio, gas ratio, and the actual transformer faults is relatively complex. Due to various methods to diagnosis characteristics and criterion, the difference of the result also often appear inconsistent when using these methods in the diagnosis of the fault conclusion, their reliability in diagnosis of different fault types are not the same. Therefore, accurately assess the reliability of the diagnostic method difference, for the selection of diagnosis methods in practical, reasonable use of the characteristics of diagnosis and new diagnostic criterion of the proposed has the vital role.","PeriodicalId":202966,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 3rd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 3rd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNEC.2019.8729079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the classical DGA fault diagnosis methods, their diagnostic characteristics information from different angles, such as gas concentration, gas ratio, gas ratio, and the actual transformer faults is relatively complex. Due to various methods to diagnosis characteristics and criterion, the difference of the result also often appear inconsistent when using these methods in the diagnosis of the fault conclusion, their reliability in diagnosis of different fault types are not the same. Therefore, accurately assess the reliability of the diagnostic method difference, for the selection of diagnosis methods in practical, reasonable use of the characteristics of diagnosis and new diagnostic criterion of the proposed has the vital role.
基于DGA的智能诊断方法双可靠性评估
经典的DGA故障诊断方法,其诊断特征信息从不同角度,如气体浓度、气体比、气体比等,与实际变压器故障比较复杂。由于各种方法的诊断特点和判据不同,在使用这些方法诊断故障结论时,结果的差异也往往出现不一致的情况,它们在诊断不同类型故障时的可靠性也不尽相同。因此,准确评估诊断方法的可靠性差异,对于实际诊断方法的选择、合理利用诊断特点和提出新的诊断标准具有至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信