Explainability in Claims models, a particular case of occupational accidents insurance

Catalina Lozano Murcia, Yenny Marcela Casanova, Francisco P. Romero
{"title":"Explainability in Claims models, a particular case of occupational accidents insurance","authors":"Catalina Lozano Murcia, Yenny Marcela Casanova, Francisco P. Romero","doi":"10.23919/cisti54924.2022.9820139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a non-exhaustive analysis of alternatives for the development of models to predict the ultimate cost of claims and explainability techniques that seek to facilitate the understanding of the different models proposed for a set of claims that occurred between 1985 and 2005.The models with the best results and the process that was carried out for the use of the different methods are shown, the tests carried out are commented and the best alternatives are identified for the prediction of the cost of claims based on the characteristics available in the base. as well as the respective analysis of explainability that seek to facilitate their understanding and, to a certain level, their review.","PeriodicalId":187896,"journal":{"name":"2022 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/cisti54924.2022.9820139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a non-exhaustive analysis of alternatives for the development of models to predict the ultimate cost of claims and explainability techniques that seek to facilitate the understanding of the different models proposed for a set of claims that occurred between 1985 and 2005.The models with the best results and the process that was carried out for the use of the different methods are shown, the tests carried out are commented and the best alternatives are identified for the prediction of the cost of claims based on the characteristics available in the base. as well as the respective analysis of explainability that seek to facilitate their understanding and, to a certain level, their review.
索赔模型的可解释性,以职业意外保险为例
本文对预测索赔最终成本的模型的发展和可解释性技术的替代方案进行了非详尽的分析,这些技术旨在促进对1985年至2005年间发生的一系列索赔提出的不同模型的理解。展示了效果最好的模型和为使用不同方法所进行的过程,对所进行的试验进行了评论,并根据数据库中现有的特征确定了预测索赔费用的最佳替代方案。以及各自的可解释性分析,试图促进他们的理解,并在一定程度上,他们的审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信