DC active electrical energy meters: Accuracy tests

C. Mester
{"title":"DC active electrical energy meters: Accuracy tests","authors":"C. Mester","doi":"10.1109/AMPS55790.2022.9978857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing spread of electric vehicles, the measurement of DC active electrical energy becomes relevant for billing purposes again. Given the large numbers of DC charging stations, efficiency is key. Calibration and testing must be highly automatised and multiple meters must be tested at the same time, as it is common practice for AC electrical energy meters. However, neither isolated current transformers nor multi secondary voltage transformers exist for DC. This paper proposes an alternative method for simultaneous testing of closed-link electrical energy meters that is suitable for DC.Often, DC active electrical energy meters differ considerably from AC electrical energy meters. For instance, the resolution of the pulse output may be the same as the resolution of the register on the display. Therefore, this article analyses the implications of using the pulse output or the register. Examples of uncertainty budgets for the two most common measurement methods, the pulse comparison method and the energy comparison method, are discussed.","PeriodicalId":253296,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 12th International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS)","volume":"297 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 12th International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AMPS55790.2022.9978857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing spread of electric vehicles, the measurement of DC active electrical energy becomes relevant for billing purposes again. Given the large numbers of DC charging stations, efficiency is key. Calibration and testing must be highly automatised and multiple meters must be tested at the same time, as it is common practice for AC electrical energy meters. However, neither isolated current transformers nor multi secondary voltage transformers exist for DC. This paper proposes an alternative method for simultaneous testing of closed-link electrical energy meters that is suitable for DC.Often, DC active electrical energy meters differ considerably from AC electrical energy meters. For instance, the resolution of the pulse output may be the same as the resolution of the register on the display. Therefore, this article analyses the implications of using the pulse output or the register. Examples of uncertainty budgets for the two most common measurement methods, the pulse comparison method and the energy comparison method, are discussed.
直流有源电能表。精度试验
随着电动汽车的日益普及,直流有功电能的测量再次成为与计费相关的问题。考虑到大量的直流充电站,效率是关键。校准和测试必须高度自动化,并且必须同时测试多个电表,因为这是交流电能表的常见做法。然而,既不存在隔离电流互感器,也不存在多次电压互感器。本文提出了一种适用于直流的闭式电能表同时测试的替代方法。通常,直流有源电能表与交流电能表差别很大。例如,脉冲输出的分辨率可能与显示器上寄存器的分辨率相同。因此,本文分析了使用脉冲输出或寄存器的含义。讨论了两种最常用的测量方法——脉冲比较法和能量比较法的不确定度预算的实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信