Quality evaluation schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs in Poland in previous and present financial perspective of EU

A. Mickiewicz, B. Mickiewicz, W. Gotkiewicz
{"title":"Quality evaluation schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs in Poland in previous and present financial perspective of EU","authors":"A. Mickiewicz, B. Mickiewicz, W. Gotkiewicz","doi":"10.22616/esrd.2019.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The study presents quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs that have been developed since the EU was founded. The schemes were based on the need to strive for diversification of agricultural production, to identify ways to increase the market value of products, while protecting consumers against inaccurate information on the ways and methods of production. The implementation of schemes has been described in the Polish context and on the example of two measures included in the next financial perspectives. The RDP 2007-2013 has been identified as using financial instruments at a low level. It means that the beneficiaries are not interested in activities related to the quality of agricultural products. In addition, the implementing body (ARR – Agricultural Market Agency) has not taken advantage of all the opportunities for encouraging beneficiaries to switch to quality production. The call for applications within the RDP 2014-2020 suggests a possibility of failure to meet specific indicators at the level of 25.9 thousand, due to the adopted criteria and difficulties in accessing the support.","PeriodicalId":123352,"journal":{"name":"20th International Scientific Conference \"Economic Science for Rural Development 2019\". New Dimensions in the Development of Society. Home Economics. Finance and Taxes. Bioeconomy.","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"20th International Scientific Conference \"Economic Science for Rural Development 2019\". New Dimensions in the Development of Society. Home Economics. Finance and Taxes. Bioeconomy.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22616/esrd.2019.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The study presents quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs that have been developed since the EU was founded. The schemes were based on the need to strive for diversification of agricultural production, to identify ways to increase the market value of products, while protecting consumers against inaccurate information on the ways and methods of production. The implementation of schemes has been described in the Polish context and on the example of two measures included in the next financial perspectives. The RDP 2007-2013 has been identified as using financial instruments at a low level. It means that the beneficiaries are not interested in activities related to the quality of agricultural products. In addition, the implementing body (ARR – Agricultural Market Agency) has not taken advantage of all the opportunities for encouraging beneficiaries to switch to quality production. The call for applications within the RDP 2014-2020 suggests a possibility of failure to meet specific indicators at the level of 25.9 thousand, due to the adopted criteria and difficulties in accessing the support.
从欧盟过去和现在的财政角度看波兰农产品和食品的质量评价方案
该研究介绍了自欧盟成立以来发展起来的农产品和食品质量计划。这些计划的基础是必须努力实现农业生产的多样化,确定增加产品市场价值的方法,同时保护消费者不受关于生产方式和方法的不准确信息的影响。在波兰的情况下,并以下一财政展望中所包括的两项措施为例,描述了各项计划的执行情况。2007-2013年的RDP已被确定为在低水平上使用金融工具。这意味着受益人对与农产品质量有关的活动不感兴趣。此外,执行机构(ARR -农业市场机构)没有利用所有机会鼓励受益人转向优质生产。2014-2020年RDP内的申请呼吁表明,由于采用的标准和获得支持的困难,可能无法达到25.9万水平的具体指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信