Semantic Intersection of Russian Physical Action Verb Groups: Entropy of Destruction Verbs

S. B. Park
{"title":"Semantic Intersection of Russian Physical Action Verb Groups: Entropy of Destruction Verbs","authors":"S. B. Park","doi":"10.24958/rh.2023.26.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the study of the thematic verb groups, in particular, the study of the physical action verb has a extremely important meaning. This verb represents a semantic group that essentially conveys the meaning of the verb for action, i.e. aggressive action. By analyzing the semantic structure of physical action verbs, we find meaningful intersections between the verb subgroups, the creative verb group and the destructive verb group. The semantic intersection of creation verbs and destruction verbs can be easily explained from a linguistic point of view. The action designated by the physical action verb involves a change of object. The creation verb and destruction verb have the same semantic structure, but only differ in the interest of the speaker. In creative verbs, the object of the action(=Result) appears to have a higher communicative rank than the material(=Patient). On the other hand, Patient, the object of the physical action in the destructive verb, would rank lower in communication than Result. The semantic correlation between creation and destruction is naturally explained through the entropy of thermodynamics. In a world where energy is constant, an equilibrium is maintained among the three energies of the original object, the physical action, and the object that changes due to the action. Also, just as the meaning of creation and destruction is distinguished according to the speaker's intention and purpose, in thermodynamics, the act of creation and destruction is distinguished according to the direction toward maximum entropy: Is the entropy of the changed object the result of adding negative entropy to the energy of the original object? Or is it the result of applying negative entropy to the world surrounding the object? In addition, the fact that entropy performs a natural function of bringing the universe into a state of dynamic equilibrium suggests that it is the verb of destruction what takes the lead intersecting the meanings of creation and destruction.","PeriodicalId":431674,"journal":{"name":"Institute for Russian and Altaic Studies Chungbuk University","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute for Russian and Altaic Studies Chungbuk University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24958/rh.2023.26.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the study of the thematic verb groups, in particular, the study of the physical action verb has a extremely important meaning. This verb represents a semantic group that essentially conveys the meaning of the verb for action, i.e. aggressive action. By analyzing the semantic structure of physical action verbs, we find meaningful intersections between the verb subgroups, the creative verb group and the destructive verb group. The semantic intersection of creation verbs and destruction verbs can be easily explained from a linguistic point of view. The action designated by the physical action verb involves a change of object. The creation verb and destruction verb have the same semantic structure, but only differ in the interest of the speaker. In creative verbs, the object of the action(=Result) appears to have a higher communicative rank than the material(=Patient). On the other hand, Patient, the object of the physical action in the destructive verb, would rank lower in communication than Result. The semantic correlation between creation and destruction is naturally explained through the entropy of thermodynamics. In a world where energy is constant, an equilibrium is maintained among the three energies of the original object, the physical action, and the object that changes due to the action. Also, just as the meaning of creation and destruction is distinguished according to the speaker's intention and purpose, in thermodynamics, the act of creation and destruction is distinguished according to the direction toward maximum entropy: Is the entropy of the changed object the result of adding negative entropy to the energy of the original object? Or is it the result of applying negative entropy to the world surrounding the object? In addition, the fact that entropy performs a natural function of bringing the universe into a state of dynamic equilibrium suggests that it is the verb of destruction what takes the lead intersecting the meanings of creation and destruction.
俄语物理动作动词群的语义交集:破坏动词的熵
在主位动词群的研究中,特别是对肢体动作动词的研究具有极其重要的意义。这个动词代表了一个语义组,这个语义组本质上传达了动词的动作意思,即攻击性动作。通过分析肢体动作动词的语义结构,我们发现了动词子组、创造性动词组和破坏性动词组之间有意义的交集。创造动词和毁灭动词的语义交集很容易从语言学的角度来解释。由物理动作动词指定的动作涉及对象的变化。创造动词和毁灭动词具有相同的语义结构,只是说话人的兴趣不同。在创造性动词中,动作的宾语(=Result)似乎比材料(=Patient)具有更高的交际等级。另一方面,在破坏性动词中,身体动作的宾语Patient在交际中的排名要低于Result。创造和毁灭之间的语义关联自然可以通过热力学的熵来解释。在一个能量恒定的世界里,原始物体、物理作用和由于作用而改变的物体的三种能量之间保持着平衡。同样,正如创造和毁灭的意义是根据说话者的意图和目的来区分的一样,在热力学中,创造和毁灭的行为是根据朝向最大熵的方向来区分的:改变物体的熵是在原物体的能量上增加负熵的结果吗?还是将负熵应用于物体周围的世界的结果?此外,熵具有将宇宙带入动态平衡状态的自然功能,这一事实表明,在创造和毁灭的含义之间起主导作用的是毁灭动词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信