Mode of Delivery and Attitudes of Midwives and Nurses Working in Primary Care towards Vaginal Delivery After Cesarean Section

Birnur Yesildag, Z. Gölbaşı
{"title":"Mode of Delivery and Attitudes of Midwives and Nurses Working in Primary Care towards Vaginal Delivery After Cesarean Section","authors":"Birnur Yesildag, Z. Gölbaşı","doi":"10.46648/gnj.392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the views of nurses and midwives working in primary care about the mode of delivery and vaginal delivery after cesarean section. Materials and Methods: The sample of the descriptive study consisted of 91 midwives and nurses working in Family Health Centers affiliated to Sivas Public Health Directorate. The data were collected with the Individual Characteristics Form prepared by the researchers, and the Form for Determining the Views of Nurses and Midwives on the Mode of Delivery. The data were analyzed in SPSS program on the computer and shown as mean, number and percentage. Results: Of the participants, 60.4% were nurses, 39.6% were midwives, 62.6% were undergraduates, 72.5% were married and 63.7% had children. 48.3% of the participants had vaginal birth and 67.2% had cesarean section experience. When the views of the participants on the mode of birth are examined; While it was determined that 91.2% agreed with the statement \"all women should give birth vaginally unless there is a medical reason\" and 89% agree with the statement that \"the decision for cesarean delivery should be made by a doctor based on medical reasons\"; It was determined that 75.8% of them did not agree with the statement \"cesarean delivery is painless\", 62.6% \"women have the right to choose the mode of delivery\" and 70.3% \"caesarean section is safer for baby\". Conclusion: The results obtained from this study show that nurses and midwives view vaginal birth positively and consider cesarean delivery as a practice that should be done if there is a medical reason. Keywords: Mode of delivery, normal delivery, cesarean section, healthcare worker.","PeriodicalId":394509,"journal":{"name":"Gevher Nesibe Journal IESDR","volume":"236 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gevher Nesibe Journal IESDR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46648/gnj.392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the views of nurses and midwives working in primary care about the mode of delivery and vaginal delivery after cesarean section. Materials and Methods: The sample of the descriptive study consisted of 91 midwives and nurses working in Family Health Centers affiliated to Sivas Public Health Directorate. The data were collected with the Individual Characteristics Form prepared by the researchers, and the Form for Determining the Views of Nurses and Midwives on the Mode of Delivery. The data were analyzed in SPSS program on the computer and shown as mean, number and percentage. Results: Of the participants, 60.4% were nurses, 39.6% were midwives, 62.6% were undergraduates, 72.5% were married and 63.7% had children. 48.3% of the participants had vaginal birth and 67.2% had cesarean section experience. When the views of the participants on the mode of birth are examined; While it was determined that 91.2% agreed with the statement "all women should give birth vaginally unless there is a medical reason" and 89% agree with the statement that "the decision for cesarean delivery should be made by a doctor based on medical reasons"; It was determined that 75.8% of them did not agree with the statement "cesarean delivery is painless", 62.6% "women have the right to choose the mode of delivery" and 70.3% "caesarean section is safer for baby". Conclusion: The results obtained from this study show that nurses and midwives view vaginal birth positively and consider cesarean delivery as a practice that should be done if there is a medical reason. Keywords: Mode of delivery, normal delivery, cesarean section, healthcare worker.
剖宫产术后助产士和护士对阴道分娩的态度及分娩方式
摘要目的:本研究的目的是了解初级保健护士和助产士对剖宫产术后分娩方式和阴道分娩的看法。材料和方法:描述性研究的样本包括在Sivas公共卫生局下属家庭保健中心工作的91名助产士和护士。数据采用研究人员编制的《个体特征表》和《护士助产士对分娩方式看法确定表》收集。数据在计算机上用SPSS程序进行分析,并以平均值、数字、百分比表示。结果:护士占60.4%,助产士占39.6%,大学生占62.6%,已婚72.5%,育有子女63.7%。48.3%的参与者有阴道分娩经验,67.2%的参与者有剖宫产经验。当调查参与者对出生方式的看法时;虽然确定91.2%的人同意“除非有医学原因,所有妇女都应顺产”的说法,89%的人同意“剖腹产的决定应由医生根据医学原因作出”的说法;对“剖宫产无痛”、“妇女有权选择分娩方式”和“剖宫产对婴儿更安全”的说法不认同的比例分别为75.8%、62.6%和70.3%。结论:本研究结果表明,护士和助产士对阴道分娩持积极态度,认为如果有医学原因,剖宫产是一种应该进行的做法。关键词:分娩方式,正常分娩,剖宫产,医护人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信