Effect of caries excavation by Carisolv and SmartPrep burs on dentin hardness — An in vitro study

Ishyani Mohan, Meenu Elizabeth Saju, Ancy Julia, Ramya Raghu, A. Shetty, D. Souparnika
{"title":"Effect of caries excavation by Carisolv and SmartPrep burs on dentin hardness — An in vitro study","authors":"Ishyani Mohan, Meenu Elizabeth Saju, Ancy Julia, Ramya Raghu, A. Shetty, D. Souparnika","doi":"10.25259/jrde_5_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate two caries excavation methods-Smartprep(SS White) burs and Carisolv (Carisolv™) by measuring the Vickers hardness of prepared cavity.\n\n\n\n40 extracted human molars with moderate occlusal caries were used in this study. Teeth with moderate caries extending till dentin without pulp involvement were selected. RVG was used to assess the depth of the cavity. The samples were divided into 2 groups, Group I by Smart prep burs and Group II using Carisolv. Each groups were subjected to morphological analysis under scanning electron microscope.\n\n\n\nThe samples prepared with Carisolv showed least difference in hardness values between the prepared surface and surrounding dentin compared to Smartprep burs. SEM analysis with Smartprep burs revealed surface covered with debris and smear layer while Carisolv showed rough and scaly surface with large areas with open dentinal tubules.\n\n\n\nRemoval of infected carious dentin was superior when Carisolv was employed as compared to SmartPrep burs. The results concluded that smear layer removal of Carisolv was superior when compared to SmartPrep burs.\n","PeriodicalId":335704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jrde_5_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate two caries excavation methods-Smartprep(SS White) burs and Carisolv (Carisolv™) by measuring the Vickers hardness of prepared cavity. 40 extracted human molars with moderate occlusal caries were used in this study. Teeth with moderate caries extending till dentin without pulp involvement were selected. RVG was used to assess the depth of the cavity. The samples were divided into 2 groups, Group I by Smart prep burs and Group II using Carisolv. Each groups were subjected to morphological analysis under scanning electron microscope. The samples prepared with Carisolv showed least difference in hardness values between the prepared surface and surrounding dentin compared to Smartprep burs. SEM analysis with Smartprep burs revealed surface covered with debris and smear layer while Carisolv showed rough and scaly surface with large areas with open dentinal tubules. Removal of infected carious dentin was superior when Carisolv was employed as compared to SmartPrep burs. The results concluded that smear layer removal of Carisolv was superior when compared to SmartPrep burs.
Carisolv和SmartPrep牙钻凿龋对牙本质硬度影响的体外研究
本研究的目的是通过测量制备的空腔的维氏硬度,对smartprep (SS White)毛刺和Carisolv (Carisolv™)两种龋挖掘方法进行比较评价。本研究选用40颗拔除的中度牙合龋的人磨牙。选择中度龋病延伸至牙本质且不累及牙髓的牙齿。RVG法评估腔体深度。将样品分为2组,第一组使用Smart准备毛刺,第二组使用Carisolv。扫描电镜下对各组进行形态学分析。与Smartprep毛刺相比,Carisolv制备的样品在制备表面和周围牙本质之间的硬度值差异最小。Smartprep毛刺扫描电镜分析显示,表面覆盖有碎屑和涂抹层,Carisolv表面粗糙,鳞片状,大面积开放的牙本质小管。与SmartPrep牙刺相比,Carisolv牙刺去除感染的牙本质效果更好。结果表明,Carisolv的涂片层去除效果优于SmartPrep。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信