Exploring the Use of White Lies in Patient Care Process by Triangulation Method

A. Nasrabadi, S. Joolaee, Elham Navvab, M. Esmaeili, Mahboubeh Shali
{"title":"Exploring the Use of White Lies in Patient Care Process by Triangulation Method","authors":"A. Nasrabadi, S. Joolaee, Elham Navvab, M. Esmaeili, Mahboubeh Shali","doi":"10.22062/JQR.2021.193612.0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Being in a situation to use white lie is a challenging experience for healthcare providers. Recognizing the situations that facilitate white lies and providing solutions to them are effective in providing patients with the truth about their treatment and reducing white lies. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of patients’ families, nurses, and physicians in using white lies during care process. Methods: This study, with a triangulation approach, was conducted in 2018 at the hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Data were collected in two qualitative and quantitative phases from three sources including patients’ families, nurses, and physicians. In the quantitative phase, 300 samples were selected by random sampling to complete a researcher-made questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and frequency tables were used to analyze the quantitative data. In the qualitative phase, 30 individuals from above-mentioned sources were selected by purposive sampling to participate in the face-to-face and semi-structured interviews. Data analysis in qualitative phase was done by Graneheim and Lundman’s conventional content analysis. In the final step, quantitative and qualitative data were compared and interpreted. Results: The findings of qualitative phase were summarized in four categories (inappropriate situation, patient expediency, surrounding frameworks, and communication bridges) and eight subcategories. In the quantitative phase, the highest score was related to the category of patient expediency. It was also found that the findings of qualitative and quantitative phases were consistent and complementary to each other. Conclusion: According to the findings, the use of white lies was for patient’s benefit and to create an appropriate situation for telling the truth. In this regard, providing appropriate guidelines in accordance with the culture, therapeutic goal, and understanding of patients can enhance caregivers’ skills in rendering information to patient. The findings of this study can be used as a guide in other qualitative and quantitative researches regarding the use of white lie in patient care and its consequences.","PeriodicalId":347126,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22062/JQR.2021.193612.0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Being in a situation to use white lie is a challenging experience for healthcare providers. Recognizing the situations that facilitate white lies and providing solutions to them are effective in providing patients with the truth about their treatment and reducing white lies. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of patients’ families, nurses, and physicians in using white lies during care process. Methods: This study, with a triangulation approach, was conducted in 2018 at the hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Data were collected in two qualitative and quantitative phases from three sources including patients’ families, nurses, and physicians. In the quantitative phase, 300 samples were selected by random sampling to complete a researcher-made questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and frequency tables were used to analyze the quantitative data. In the qualitative phase, 30 individuals from above-mentioned sources were selected by purposive sampling to participate in the face-to-face and semi-structured interviews. Data analysis in qualitative phase was done by Graneheim and Lundman’s conventional content analysis. In the final step, quantitative and qualitative data were compared and interpreted. Results: The findings of qualitative phase were summarized in four categories (inappropriate situation, patient expediency, surrounding frameworks, and communication bridges) and eight subcategories. In the quantitative phase, the highest score was related to the category of patient expediency. It was also found that the findings of qualitative and quantitative phases were consistent and complementary to each other. Conclusion: According to the findings, the use of white lies was for patient’s benefit and to create an appropriate situation for telling the truth. In this regard, providing appropriate guidelines in accordance with the culture, therapeutic goal, and understanding of patients can enhance caregivers’ skills in rendering information to patient. The findings of this study can be used as a guide in other qualitative and quantitative researches regarding the use of white lie in patient care and its consequences.
用三角法探讨善意谎言在病人护理过程中的运用
引言:对于医疗保健提供者来说,使用善意的谎言是一种具有挑战性的经历。认识到有利于善意谎言的情况,并提供解决方案,可以有效地向患者提供有关治疗的真相,减少善意谎言。本研究旨在探讨病人家属、护士及医生在护理过程中使用善意谎言的经验。方法:本研究于2018年在德黑兰医科大学附属医院进行。从患者家属、护士和医生三个来源收集数据,分为定性和定量两个阶段。在定量阶段,随机抽取300个样本,完成一份研究者自行制作的问卷。定量数据采用描述性统计和频率表进行分析。在定性阶段,采用有目的抽样的方法,从上述来源中选取30人进行面对面访谈和半结构化访谈。定性阶段的数据分析采用Graneheim和Lundman传统的内容分析方法。在最后一步,定量和定性数据进行比较和解释。结果:定性阶段的研究结果归纳为4类(不适宜情况、患者权宜、周边框架、沟通桥梁)和8个亚类。在定量阶段,得分最高的与患者的权宜之计有关。还发现,定性阶段和定量阶段的研究结果是一致和相辅相成的。结论:根据研究结果,善意谎言的使用是为了病人的利益,并为讲真话创造一个合适的环境。在这方面,根据文化、治疗目标和对患者的理解提供适当的指导可以提高护理人员向患者提供信息的技能。本研究的结果可以作为其他关于善意谎言在病人护理中的使用及其后果的定性和定量研究的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信