Error analysis of descriptive writings by pre-service EFL teachers: A case study in Indonesia

Siti Lestari, Rahmawati Sukmaningrum, Eka Setia Widhianto
{"title":"Error analysis of descriptive writings by pre-service EFL teachers: A case study in Indonesia","authors":"Siti Lestari, Rahmawati Sukmaningrum, Eka Setia Widhianto","doi":"10.35961/salee.v3i1.384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research investigates pre-service EFL teachers’ writing proficiency by analyzing errors made in their descriptive essays. Conducted in one teacher training university in Indonesia, 40 randomly selected writing products assigned for the Writing course of 160 pre-service teachers, who are novice writers, were qualitatively analyzed. The result of the analysis showed that there were sentence fragments with 21 times or 42 %. It means that sentence fragment was the most dominant error done by students. Sentence fragment appeared due to the absence required in a complete sentence. Run-on sentence and comma splice existed 16 times or 32 %. Run-on sentences and comma splices appeared due to the wrong in combining two independent clauses. Choppy sentence were found 10 times or 20 % due to the use of too many short sentences, sometimes often repeating the same word at the beginning of a sentence. Stringy sentence were identified 3 times or 6 % of the whole essays due to the use of too many clauses with connected words. These clauses strung together forming one very long ineffective sentences. The findings are expected to reveal a comprehensive evaluation of writing proficiency of pre-service teachers and call for students, teacher educators, and policy makers to more concern with this crucial issue.","PeriodicalId":232120,"journal":{"name":"SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v3i1.384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research investigates pre-service EFL teachers’ writing proficiency by analyzing errors made in their descriptive essays. Conducted in one teacher training university in Indonesia, 40 randomly selected writing products assigned for the Writing course of 160 pre-service teachers, who are novice writers, were qualitatively analyzed. The result of the analysis showed that there were sentence fragments with 21 times or 42 %. It means that sentence fragment was the most dominant error done by students. Sentence fragment appeared due to the absence required in a complete sentence. Run-on sentence and comma splice existed 16 times or 32 %. Run-on sentences and comma splices appeared due to the wrong in combining two independent clauses. Choppy sentence were found 10 times or 20 % due to the use of too many short sentences, sometimes often repeating the same word at the beginning of a sentence. Stringy sentence were identified 3 times or 6 % of the whole essays due to the use of too many clauses with connected words. These clauses strung together forming one very long ineffective sentences. The findings are expected to reveal a comprehensive evaluation of writing proficiency of pre-service teachers and call for students, teacher educators, and policy makers to more concern with this crucial issue.
职前英语教师描述性写作的错误分析:以印度尼西亚为例
本研究通过分析职前英语教师描述性作文中的错误,来考察职前英语教师的写作水平。在印度尼西亚的一所教师培训大学中,随机抽取40种写作产品,分配给160名初学写作的职前教师的写作课程,对其进行定性分析。分析结果表明,句子片段出现21次,占42%。这意味着句子片段是学生犯的最主要错误。由于一个完整的句子中缺少所需的词而出现句子片段。连句和逗号拼接出现16次,占32%。由于两个独立子句组合错误,出现了连句和逗号拼接。有10次或20%的人出现了不连贯的句子,这是由于使用了太多的短句,有时经常在句子的开头重复同一个单词。由于连词从句使用过多,出现了3次或6%的串句。这些从句串在一起形成了一个很长很无效的句子。研究结果有望揭示对职前教师写作能力的全面评估,并呼吁学生、教师教育者和政策制定者更多地关注这一关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信