Samoson Ratsaranrom (Khana Ratsadon’s Office): A Neglected Urban Heritage of the People’s Party

Koompong Noobanjong
{"title":"Samoson Ratsaranrom (Khana Ratsadon’s Office): A Neglected Urban Heritage of the People’s Party","authors":"Koompong Noobanjong","doi":"10.56261/jars.v20i1.249697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current architectural scholarship in Thailand has witnessed a renewal of interest in built forms commissioned by the People’s Party, a group of civil servants and military officers known in Thai as Khana Ratsadon that overthrew the absolute monarchy in 1932. Despite an increasing number of publications on the arts and architecture of the People’s Party, its office in Bangkok remains largely absent from those investigations and public recognition. As such, this research presents a multidimensional inquiry to better understand the role of Samoson Ratsaranrom in Thai society. Once functioning as Khana Ratsadon’s office, the building was examined in terms of: (1) means for power mediation; (2) reflection of the ideological views of the People’s Party; and (3) expression of the modern Thai identity. Via discourse and iconographical analyses, the study revealed that apart from serving as a material manifestation of the revolutionary spirit and ideology, this modest structure acted as a social space for interactions between people through festivities, namely the annual constitutional fairs. Standing unassumingly in Saranrom Royal Garden–which has become a public park nowadays–the building was an integral part of the cultural practices during the early days of the post-absolutist regime. Owing to the said historical importance, a proposition could be put forward that not only should Khana Ratsadon’s office be incorporated into DOCOMOMO Thailand’s inventory, but also be registered as a national treasure by the Fine Arts Department. In addition, critical examination of this Modernist structure begged a question as to whether the academic obscurity of the building was indicative of attempts to erase the cultural legacies the People’s Party by the Thai state, which had been subtly implemented for decades. Regardless of the answer, recent destruction and disappearance of the cultural heritages left behind by the People’s Party make the preservation of Samoson Ratsaranrom even more urgent.","PeriodicalId":428713,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56261/jars.v20i1.249697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current architectural scholarship in Thailand has witnessed a renewal of interest in built forms commissioned by the People’s Party, a group of civil servants and military officers known in Thai as Khana Ratsadon that overthrew the absolute monarchy in 1932. Despite an increasing number of publications on the arts and architecture of the People’s Party, its office in Bangkok remains largely absent from those investigations and public recognition. As such, this research presents a multidimensional inquiry to better understand the role of Samoson Ratsaranrom in Thai society. Once functioning as Khana Ratsadon’s office, the building was examined in terms of: (1) means for power mediation; (2) reflection of the ideological views of the People’s Party; and (3) expression of the modern Thai identity. Via discourse and iconographical analyses, the study revealed that apart from serving as a material manifestation of the revolutionary spirit and ideology, this modest structure acted as a social space for interactions between people through festivities, namely the annual constitutional fairs. Standing unassumingly in Saranrom Royal Garden–which has become a public park nowadays–the building was an integral part of the cultural practices during the early days of the post-absolutist regime. Owing to the said historical importance, a proposition could be put forward that not only should Khana Ratsadon’s office be incorporated into DOCOMOMO Thailand’s inventory, but also be registered as a national treasure by the Fine Arts Department. In addition, critical examination of this Modernist structure begged a question as to whether the academic obscurity of the building was indicative of attempts to erase the cultural legacies the People’s Party by the Thai state, which had been subtly implemented for decades. Regardless of the answer, recent destruction and disappearance of the cultural heritages left behind by the People’s Party make the preservation of Samoson Ratsaranrom even more urgent.
Samoson Ratsaranrom (Khana Ratsadon的办公室):人民党被忽视的城市遗产
目前,泰国的建筑学者见证了人们对人民党(People’s Party)委托建造的建筑形式的重新兴趣,人民党是一群公务员和军官,在泰国被称为Khana Ratsadon,他们在1932年推翻了绝对君主制。尽管关于人民党的艺术和建筑的出版物越来越多,但它在曼谷的办公室基本上没有受到这些调查和公众的认可。因此,本研究提出了一个多维度的调查,以更好地了解萨摩逊在泰国社会中的作用。曾经作为Khana Ratsadon的办公室,该建筑在以下方面进行了审查:(1)权力调解的手段;(2)人民党思想观点的反映;(3)现代泰国身份的表达。通过话语和图像分析,该研究揭示了除了作为革命精神和意识形态的物质表现之外,这个适度的结构还作为人们通过庆祝活动(即年度宪法集市)进行互动的社会空间。这座建筑谦逊地矗立在如今已成为公园的萨兰罗姆皇家花园(Saranrom Royal garden),是后专制主义政权早期文化实践的一个组成部分。由于上述历史重要性,可以提出的建议是,不仅应该将Khana Ratsadon的办公室纳入泰国DOCOMOMO的清单,而且还应该被美术部门注册为国宝。此外,对这座现代主义建筑的批判性审查提出了一个问题,即这座建筑的学术模糊性是否表明泰国国家试图抹去人民党的文化遗产,这已经巧妙地实施了几十年。不管答案是什么,人民党留下的文化遗产最近遭到破坏和消失,使得保护萨摩逊寺变得更加紧迫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信