Preferences and Objective Interests

K. Dowding
{"title":"Preferences and Objective Interests","authors":"K. Dowding","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvkjb3vq.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most controversial aspects of the study of power is the relationship to interests. Some writers take interests of a person to be as that person understands it themself. Other writers see interests as objective and humans might often believe and act in ways that against their own best interests. The chapter introduces three theses – ontological, epistemological and methodological to show how these latter objective interests can exist, can be recognized and discovered through a theory of action within context. It distinguishes need and desire and shows through the collective action problem how we can model objective interests even when people do not act in those interests. It applies the model to some classic community power studies re-interpreting their conclusions in the light of the model. It also simply demonstrates how agenda setting can affect interests.","PeriodicalId":259292,"journal":{"name":"Rational Choice and Political Power","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rational Choice and Political Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkjb3vq.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most controversial aspects of the study of power is the relationship to interests. Some writers take interests of a person to be as that person understands it themself. Other writers see interests as objective and humans might often believe and act in ways that against their own best interests. The chapter introduces three theses – ontological, epistemological and methodological to show how these latter objective interests can exist, can be recognized and discovered through a theory of action within context. It distinguishes need and desire and shows through the collective action problem how we can model objective interests even when people do not act in those interests. It applies the model to some classic community power studies re-interpreting their conclusions in the light of the model. It also simply demonstrates how agenda setting can affect interests.
偏好与客观利益
权力研究中最具争议的一个方面是权力与利益的关系。有些作家对一个人感兴趣,就像那个人自己理解的那样。其他作家认为利益是客观的,人类可能经常相信并以违背自己最佳利益的方式行事。本章介绍了三篇论文——本体论、认识论和方法论,以展示后一种客观利益是如何存在的,如何通过行动理论在语境中被认识和发现的。它区分了需要和欲望,并通过集体行动问题展示了我们如何在人们不为这些利益而行动的情况下为客观利益建模。将该模型应用于一些经典的社区权力研究,并根据该模型对其结论进行了重新解释。它还简单地说明了议程设置如何影响利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信