MIS or MS? Source/drain contact scheme evaluation for 7nm Si CMOS technology and beyond

Hao Yu, M. Schaekers, S. Demuynck, K. Barla, A. Mocuta, N. Horiguchi, N. Collaert, A. Thean, K. De Meyer
{"title":"MIS or MS? Source/drain contact scheme evaluation for 7nm Si CMOS technology and beyond","authors":"Hao Yu, M. Schaekers, S. Demuynck, K. Barla, A. Mocuta, N. Horiguchi, N. Collaert, A. Thean, K. De Meyer","doi":"10.1109/IWJT.2016.7486665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contact resistance at the transistor source/drain becomes a bottleneck for modern Si CMOS technology. To seek for contact solutions, this paper compares metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) contacts and metal-semiconductor (MS) direct contacts in terms of contact resistivity and CMOS compatibility. On p-type substrates, due to the favorable surface Fermi level pinning, MS contact has absolute advantage over MIS. On n-type substrates, on the one hand, we find MIS contacts have relatively high contact resistivity despite the low Schottky barrier height; the low thermal stability of MIS is also worrying. On the other hand, with MS contacts, we use a pre-amorphization based Ti silicidation technique and achieve contact resistivity of 1.5×10-9 Ω·cm2. Therefore, for both NMOS and PMOS, we confirm that MS contacts are still the prevailing contact scheme. Advanced MS interface engineering is able to help reach the target contact resistivity required by advanced CMOS technology.","PeriodicalId":117665,"journal":{"name":"2016 16th International Workshop on Junction Technology (IWJT)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 16th International Workshop on Junction Technology (IWJT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWJT.2016.7486665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Contact resistance at the transistor source/drain becomes a bottleneck for modern Si CMOS technology. To seek for contact solutions, this paper compares metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) contacts and metal-semiconductor (MS) direct contacts in terms of contact resistivity and CMOS compatibility. On p-type substrates, due to the favorable surface Fermi level pinning, MS contact has absolute advantage over MIS. On n-type substrates, on the one hand, we find MIS contacts have relatively high contact resistivity despite the low Schottky barrier height; the low thermal stability of MIS is also worrying. On the other hand, with MS contacts, we use a pre-amorphization based Ti silicidation technique and achieve contact resistivity of 1.5×10-9 Ω·cm2. Therefore, for both NMOS and PMOS, we confirm that MS contacts are still the prevailing contact scheme. Advanced MS interface engineering is able to help reach the target contact resistivity required by advanced CMOS technology.
MIS还是MS?7nm Si CMOS及以上技术的源/漏极接触方案评估
晶体管源极/漏极处的接触电阻成为现代Si CMOS技术的瓶颈。为了寻求触点解决方案,本文比较了金属-绝缘体-半导体(MIS)触点和金属-半导体(MS)直接触点在接触电阻率和CMOS兼容性方面的差异。在p型衬底上,由于良好的表面费米水平钉住,MS接触比MIS具有绝对优势。在n型衬底上,一方面,我们发现MIS触点具有相对较高的接触电阻率,尽管其肖特基势垒高度较低;MIS的低热稳定性也令人担忧。另一方面,对于MS触点,我们使用基于预非晶化的Ti硅化技术,获得了1.5×10-9 Ω·cm2的接触电阻率。因此,对于NMOS和PMOS,我们确认MS接触仍然是主要的接触方案。先进的MS界面工程能够帮助达到先进CMOS技术所需的目标接触电阻率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信