Advertising Ethics and Professionalism of ZNBC Radio 4 and Radio Phoenix in Zambia—A Content Analysis Study

Fidelis Muzyamba, K. Nordenstreng, M. Lemba
{"title":"Advertising Ethics and Professionalism of ZNBC Radio 4 and Radio Phoenix in Zambia—A Content Analysis Study","authors":"Fidelis Muzyamba, K. Nordenstreng, M. Lemba","doi":"10.4236/ajc.2020.83007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This \nstudy of ethics and professionalism in the content of Radio Phoenix and ZNBC \nRadio 4 was inspired by, among other things, occasional public controversies in \nZambia over the content of advertising. It sought to examine the advertisements \ngathered over a period of one week after being aired during prime-time, before, \nduring, and after the “Shopping basket” programme for radio Phoenix, and the \n18:00 hrs. News summary for ZNBC Radio 4, to determine extent to which \nunethical and unprofessional advertising occurred. The sample is from 2012. The \nmain research question was: To what extent does unethical and, or \nunprofessional advertising feature in radio broadcast advertising in the two \nstations? The alternative hypothesis being tested was: There was more unethical content in \nthe private station than in the quasi-government/public radio station. To effectively deal \nwith the question and hypothesis, some sub-hypotheses were also tested to help \narrive at a conclusion. The study found that, with respect to “ethical” and \n“unethical” conduct, there was a mixture of both, as well as incidence of both “professional” and “unprofessional” outputs.","PeriodicalId":405628,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Journalism and Communication","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Journalism and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ajc.2020.83007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study of ethics and professionalism in the content of Radio Phoenix and ZNBC Radio 4 was inspired by, among other things, occasional public controversies in Zambia over the content of advertising. It sought to examine the advertisements gathered over a period of one week after being aired during prime-time, before, during, and after the “Shopping basket” programme for radio Phoenix, and the 18:00 hrs. News summary for ZNBC Radio 4, to determine extent to which unethical and unprofessional advertising occurred. The sample is from 2012. The main research question was: To what extent does unethical and, or unprofessional advertising feature in radio broadcast advertising in the two stations? The alternative hypothesis being tested was: There was more unethical content in the private station than in the quasi-government/public radio station. To effectively deal with the question and hypothesis, some sub-hypotheses were also tested to help arrive at a conclusion. The study found that, with respect to “ethical” and “unethical” conduct, there was a mixture of both, as well as incidence of both “professional” and “unprofessional” outputs.
ZNBC第四广播电台和凤凰广播电台在赞比亚的广告伦理与职业精神——内容分析研究
这项关于凤凰电台和赞比亚全国广播公司第4电台内容的道德和专业精神的研究,除其他外,是受到赞比亚公众对广告内容偶尔发生的争议的启发。它试图审查在黄金时段、凤凰电台“购物篮”节目之前、期间和之后以及18点播出的一周内收集的广告。ZNBC电台4的新闻摘要,以确定不道德和不专业的广告发生的程度。样本来自2012年。主要的研究问题是:不道德和不专业的广告在多大程度上出现在两个电台的广播广告中?被测试的另一个假设是:私人电台比准政府/公共广播电台有更多不道德的内容。为了有效地处理问题和假设,还测试了一些子假设,以帮助得出结论。研究发现,在“道德”和“不道德”行为方面,两者兼而有之,“专业”和“非专业”的产出也都有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信