Comparison of Natural Deduction Theorem Provers used in Electronic Tutoring Systems

Larry Joshua Crotts, Stephen Tate
{"title":"Comparison of Natural Deduction Theorem Provers used in Electronic Tutoring Systems","authors":"Larry Joshua Crotts, Stephen Tate","doi":"10.1145/3578837.3578844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we describe a methodology for comparing the efficacy of openly-available natural deduction tutoring software for students. Our proposed evaluation metrics are objective and can be applied to systems during development, before student-based assessments are feasible. We apply our assessment to five natural deduction tutoring systems, including two currently under development, and report the results of these evaluations and comparisons.","PeriodicalId":150970,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Education and E-Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Education and E-Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3578837.3578844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper we describe a methodology for comparing the efficacy of openly-available natural deduction tutoring software for students. Our proposed evaluation metrics are objective and can be applied to systems during development, before student-based assessments are feasible. We apply our assessment to five natural deduction tutoring systems, including two currently under development, and report the results of these evaluations and comparisons.
电子教学系统中自然演绎定理证明的比较
在本文中,我们描述了一种比较公开可用的自然演绎辅导软件对学生的效果的方法。我们提出的评估标准是客观的,并且可以在基于学生的评估可行之前应用于开发过程中的系统。我们将我们的评估应用于五种自然演绎辅导系统,包括目前正在开发的两种,并报告这些评估和比较的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信