The application of the anti-accumulation clause in criminal procedure to public – law liabilities – some remarks based on the resolution of Supreme Court no. I KZP 15/16

Milena Garwol
{"title":"The application of the anti-accumulation clause in criminal procedure to public – law liabilities – some remarks based on the resolution of Supreme Court no. I KZP 15/16","authors":"Milena Garwol","doi":"10.16926/gea.2021.02.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article mentions the issue of an application of the anti-accumulation clause in criminal procedure to public-law liabilities. The author’s view is critical to the argumentation presented by the Supreme Court. The assumption made in this resolution can lead to double punishment for the same behaviour and does not distinguish the situation between perpetrators, depending on the character of commited injury not the forbidden act. The statement presented in the sentence also raises doubts form the civil law perspective and does not see the position of the victim.","PeriodicalId":166701,"journal":{"name":"Gubernaculum et Administratio","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gubernaculum et Administratio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16926/gea.2021.02.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article mentions the issue of an application of the anti-accumulation clause in criminal procedure to public-law liabilities. The author’s view is critical to the argumentation presented by the Supreme Court. The assumption made in this resolution can lead to double punishment for the same behaviour and does not distinguish the situation between perpetrators, depending on the character of commited injury not the forbidden act. The statement presented in the sentence also raises doubts form the civil law perspective and does not see the position of the victim.
刑事诉讼中反积累条款在公法责任中的适用——基于最高人民法院第2号决议的评析。I KZP 15/16
本文论述了刑事诉讼中反积累条款在公法责任中的适用问题。作者的观点对最高法院提出的论点至关重要。本决议所作的假设可能导致对同一行为的双重惩罚,并且不根据所造成伤害的性质而不是根据所禁止的行为来区分肇事者的情况。判决中提出的陈述也从民法的角度提出质疑,没有看到受害者的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信