Ārkārtējā situācija Latvijā – regulējums un konstitucionālais pamats

Tomass Hodosevičs
{"title":"Ārkārtējā situācija Latvijā – regulējums un konstitucionālais pamats","authors":"Tomass Hodosevičs","doi":"10.22364/juzk.80.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unlike many other countries in the EU, only a special legal regime regarding threats of a military nature (state of exception) has been directly established in Latvia at the constitutional level. However, the institute of the state of emergency provided for in the special law was widely used during the Covid-19 pandemic. Both regimes are extremely similar in content and differ mostly in their basis of application. Therefore, the issue of the compliance of state of emergency with the Constitution of Latvia (Satversme) becomes topical. With regard to avoiding an unreasonable conclusion that the Satversme precludes the state of emergency, the author provides analysis of development of Latvian regulation and highlights the historical aspects in context of specifics of interpretation of the Satversme.","PeriodicalId":413617,"journal":{"name":"Latvijas Republikas Satversmei – 100","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latvijas Republikas Satversmei – 100","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.80.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlike many other countries in the EU, only a special legal regime regarding threats of a military nature (state of exception) has been directly established in Latvia at the constitutional level. However, the institute of the state of emergency provided for in the special law was widely used during the Covid-19 pandemic. Both regimes are extremely similar in content and differ mostly in their basis of application. Therefore, the issue of the compliance of state of emergency with the Constitution of Latvia (Satversme) becomes topical. With regard to avoiding an unreasonable conclusion that the Satversme precludes the state of emergency, the author provides analysis of development of Latvian regulation and highlights the historical aspects in context of specifics of interpretation of the Satversme.
与欧盟许多其他国家不同,拉脱维亚只在宪法一级直接建立了一个关于军事性质的威胁(例外状态)的特殊法律制度。然而,在新冠肺炎大流行期间,特别法规定的紧急状态制度被广泛使用。这两种制度在内容上极为相似,但在适用基础上主要不同。因此,紧急状态是否符合《拉脱维亚宪法》的问题成为热门话题。为了避免不合理地得出《紧急状态法》排除紧急状态的结论,提交人分析了拉脱维亚法规的发展,并在解释《紧急状态法》的具体情况的背景下强调了历史方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信