Nepalese and Indian Foreign Policy and International Relations

Jant Raj Karky
{"title":"Nepalese and Indian Foreign Policy and International Relations","authors":"Jant Raj Karky","doi":"10.3126/hisan.v8i1.53070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between and among the foreign political units of the world waite since the establishment of modern state system (1648 Westphalia treaty). With the development of science and technology (sophisticated arms, means of transportation and communication) international relation has been highly complex. Likewise, modernism also has dragged international relation towards vagueness. International relations is a phenomena emerged with the creation of nation states. The development of nation states itself was a logical corollary to the growth of capitalism. Capitalism created larger territories which was basically due to expanding markets. Capitalism not only to the emergence of Nation-state but to colonialism as well. Therefore, international relations, till the end of world war II, was not between sovereign equal nations but most often between colonial power which were European and their colonies. To study international relations, colonization and decolonization theory, idealist school, realist school, liberalist school and geopolitical theory etc. are commonly used. While talking about foreign policy of Nepal and India, we find similarities i.e. NAM, panchasheela, respect to international law/organization etc, but Indian foreign policy practice towards Nepal is quite different than its theories.","PeriodicalId":383967,"journal":{"name":"HISAN: Journal of History Association of Nepal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISAN: Journal of History Association of Nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/hisan.v8i1.53070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between and among the foreign political units of the world waite since the establishment of modern state system (1648 Westphalia treaty). With the development of science and technology (sophisticated arms, means of transportation and communication) international relation has been highly complex. Likewise, modernism also has dragged international relation towards vagueness. International relations is a phenomena emerged with the creation of nation states. The development of nation states itself was a logical corollary to the growth of capitalism. Capitalism created larger territories which was basically due to expanding markets. Capitalism not only to the emergence of Nation-state but to colonialism as well. Therefore, international relations, till the end of world war II, was not between sovereign equal nations but most often between colonial power which were European and their colonies. To study international relations, colonization and decolonization theory, idealist school, realist school, liberalist school and geopolitical theory etc. are commonly used. While talking about foreign policy of Nepal and India, we find similarities i.e. NAM, panchasheela, respect to international law/organization etc, but Indian foreign policy practice towards Nepal is quite different than its theories.
尼泊尔和印度外交政策和国际关系
近代国家体系(1648年《威斯特伐利亚条约》)建立以来,世界各外国政治单位之间的关系就一直存在。随着科学技术(尖端武器、交通和通讯工具)的发展,国际关系变得高度复杂。同样,现代主义也把国际关系拖向了模糊。国际关系是随着民族国家的产生而出现的现象。民族国家的发展本身是资本主义发展的必然结果。资本主义创造了更大的领土,这基本上是由于扩大市场。资本主义不仅导致了民族国家的出现,也导致了殖民主义的出现。因此,直到第二次世界大战结束,国际关系并不是主权平等的国家之间的关系,而通常是欧洲殖民者和他们的殖民地之间的关系。在国际关系研究中,殖民与非殖民化理论、理想主义学派、现实主义学派、自由主义学派和地缘政治理论等被广泛运用。在谈论尼泊尔和印度的外交政策时,我们发现了相似之处,即不结盟运动、panchasheela、对国际法/组织的尊重等,但印度对尼泊尔的外交政策实践与其理论大不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信