Disproving Market Demand and Market Supply

Hak Choi
{"title":"Disproving Market Demand and Market Supply","authors":"Hak Choi","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3203158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper disproves the concepts of market demand and market supply. It discovers two suspicions that such concepts may be wrong: they deliver uncertain equilibrium or infinite price, and their elasticity preservation creates an identity crisis. In contrast, this paper works out how incessant arbitrage by laissez faire people generates market price, to render market demand or market supply unnecessary. Market demand or supply, if any, represents autocracy, suppresses individuality, and hence should not belong to Economics.","PeriodicalId":260073,"journal":{"name":"Mathematics eJournal","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3203158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper disproves the concepts of market demand and market supply. It discovers two suspicions that such concepts may be wrong: they deliver uncertain equilibrium or infinite price, and their elasticity preservation creates an identity crisis. In contrast, this paper works out how incessant arbitrage by laissez faire people generates market price, to render market demand or market supply unnecessary. Market demand or supply, if any, represents autocracy, suppresses individuality, and hence should not belong to Economics.
否定市场需求和市场供给
本文反驳了市场需求和市场供给的概念。它发现了对这些概念可能是错误的两种怀疑:它们提供了不确定的均衡或无限的价格,它们的弹性保留造成了身份危机。与此相反,本文研究的是自由放任者不断的套利如何产生市场价格,从而使市场需求或市场供给变得不必要。市场需求或供给,如果有的话,代表专制,压制个性,因此不应该属于经济学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信