COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF CULTURING CELLS AND VIRUSES ON THE NEW SEPLIFE® LX-MC-DEX1 MICROCARRIER WITH EXISTING MICROCARRIERS

Sh. S. Turyskeldi, Z. Sametova, A. K. Usembay, Y. Bulatov
{"title":"COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF CULTURING CELLS AND VIRUSES ON THE NEW SEPLIFE® LX-MC-DEX1 MICROCARRIER WITH EXISTING MICROCARRIERS","authors":"Sh. S. Turyskeldi, Z. Sametova, A. K. Usembay, Y. Bulatov","doi":"10.58318/2957-5702-2022-11-13-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"microcarriers are small solid particles 90–350 µm in size, on the surface of which cells grow in the form of a monolayer. The two main properties of microcarriers are cell adhesion and high cell production. According to the results of a comparative study conducted on various parameters, it was determined that each microcarrier has its own advantages and disadvantages. In our study, the properties of SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 and Cytodex 3 microcarriers were compared. According to the results of the studies, it was found that SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1, containing an artificial substance, is not inferior to Cytodex 3 microcarrier widely used in production in all properties and ease of use. The main advantage of the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier is its cost effectiveness, i.e. it is 5 times cheaper than Cytodex 3. In this regard, the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier was found to be cost-effective.","PeriodicalId":307725,"journal":{"name":"Biosafety and Biotechnology","volume":"49 1-2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosafety and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58318/2957-5702-2022-11-13-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

microcarriers are small solid particles 90–350 µm in size, on the surface of which cells grow in the form of a monolayer. The two main properties of microcarriers are cell adhesion and high cell production. According to the results of a comparative study conducted on various parameters, it was determined that each microcarrier has its own advantages and disadvantages. In our study, the properties of SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 and Cytodex 3 microcarriers were compared. According to the results of the studies, it was found that SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1, containing an artificial substance, is not inferior to Cytodex 3 microcarrier widely used in production in all properties and ease of use. The main advantage of the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier is its cost effectiveness, i.e. it is 5 times cheaper than Cytodex 3. In this regard, the SEPLIFE® LX-MC-dex1 microcarrier was found to be cost-effective.
新型seplife®lx-mc-dex1微载体与现有微载体培养细胞和病毒的结果比较
微载体是尺寸为90-350µm的小固体颗粒,细胞在其表面以单层的形式生长。微载体的两个主要特性是细胞粘附性和高细胞产量。根据各种参数的对比研究结果,确定了每种微载体都有自己的优点和缺点。在我们的研究中,比较了SEPLIFE®LX-MC-dex1和Cytodex 3微载体的性质。根据研究结果,发现含有人工物质的SEPLIFE®LX-MC-dex1在所有性能和易用性上都不逊于生产中广泛使用的Cytodex 3微载体。SEPLIFE®LX-MC-dex1微载体的主要优势在于其成本效益,即它比Cytodex 3便宜5倍。在这方面,发现SEPLIFE®LX-MC-dex1微载体具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信