Semiotization of Russian aggression against Ukraine in Chinese diplomatic discourse

О. Y. Fedichev
{"title":"Semiotization of Russian aggression against Ukraine in Chinese diplomatic discourse","authors":"О. Y. Fedichev","doi":"10.32589/2311-0821.2.2022.274927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article attempts to apply the methods of critical discourse research proposed by T. A. van Dijk to analyze the position of the Chinese side regarding the aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, declared by senior officials of the People’s Republic of China in the period from the beginning of the large-scale invasion on February 24, 2022 to the end of August, 2022. The structural, lexical-semantic and pragmatic aspects of the texts of the relevant documents posted on the official Internet resources of the state authorities of the People’s Republic of China are analyzed, taking into account the current international political context, the actual interests of China in the global and regional dimensions, through the prism of which it is considered appropriate to see, in particular, official Beijing’s rhetoric regarding possible ways to achieve peace. The author conducted a detailed analysis of the texts of the official statements of the President of the People’s Republic of China Xi Jinping, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of China Wang Yi, the Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China Yang Jiechi, as well as messages on the official Internet resources of the state authorities of the People’s Republic of China about their negotiations with foreign partners, where the issue of the war in Ukraine was raised. Based on the results of the analysis of fragments of the discourse, taking into account the current geopolitical context, the key discursive goals that the Chinese side is most likely trying to achieve are determined, namely: positive self-presentation of China as a peace-loving state, which, moreover, steadfastly adheres to the norms and principles of international law against the background of creating a negative the image of Western countries, first of all, its key geopolitical competitor – the USA – as states that contribute to the escalation of war for the sake of achieving their own geopolitical goals, an attempt to neutralize the negative image of the Russian Federation by promoting theses about the “historical causes” of the conflict as a justification for the fact of aggression.","PeriodicalId":217176,"journal":{"name":"MESSENGER of Kyiv National Linguistic University. Series Philology","volume":"45 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MESSENGER of Kyiv National Linguistic University. Series Philology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32589/2311-0821.2.2022.274927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article attempts to apply the methods of critical discourse research proposed by T. A. van Dijk to analyze the position of the Chinese side regarding the aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, declared by senior officials of the People’s Republic of China in the period from the beginning of the large-scale invasion on February 24, 2022 to the end of August, 2022. The structural, lexical-semantic and pragmatic aspects of the texts of the relevant documents posted on the official Internet resources of the state authorities of the People’s Republic of China are analyzed, taking into account the current international political context, the actual interests of China in the global and regional dimensions, through the prism of which it is considered appropriate to see, in particular, official Beijing’s rhetoric regarding possible ways to achieve peace. The author conducted a detailed analysis of the texts of the official statements of the President of the People’s Republic of China Xi Jinping, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of China Wang Yi, the Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China Yang Jiechi, as well as messages on the official Internet resources of the state authorities of the People’s Republic of China about their negotiations with foreign partners, where the issue of the war in Ukraine was raised. Based on the results of the analysis of fragments of the discourse, taking into account the current geopolitical context, the key discursive goals that the Chinese side is most likely trying to achieve are determined, namely: positive self-presentation of China as a peace-loving state, which, moreover, steadfastly adheres to the norms and principles of international law against the background of creating a negative the image of Western countries, first of all, its key geopolitical competitor – the USA – as states that contribute to the escalation of war for the sake of achieving their own geopolitical goals, an attempt to neutralize the negative image of the Russian Federation by promoting theses about the “historical causes” of the conflict as a justification for the fact of aggression.
俄罗斯侵略乌克兰在中国外交话语中的符号化
本文试图运用范戴克(t.a. van Dijk)提出的批评话语研究方法,分析中华人民共和国高级官员在2022年2月24日大规模入侵开始至2022年8月底期间,对俄罗斯联邦侵略乌克兰的表态,中方的立场。考虑到当前的国际政治背景,中国在全球和地区层面的实际利益,本文分析了中华人民共和国官方互联网资源上发布的相关文件文本的结构、词汇-语义和语用方面,通过棱镜,特别是北京官方关于实现和平的可能途径的言论,被认为是合适的。在那里提出了乌克兰战争的问题。根据对话语片段的分析结果,考虑到当前的地缘政治背景,确定了中方最有可能试图实现的关键话语目标,即:中国作为一个爱好和平的国家的积极自我展示,并且坚定地坚持国际法的准则和原则,而西方国家的负面形象,首先是其主要的地缘政治竞争对手-美国-作为为了实现自己的地缘政治目标而促成战争升级的国家。企图通过宣传关于冲突的“历史原因”的论点作为侵略事实的理由来消除俄罗斯联邦的负面形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信