OCCLUSION IN IMPLANT-AT A GLANCE

K. Mishra, D. Hegde, S. Shetty, Sanjana Shah, S. Sreeram, S. Reddy
{"title":"OCCLUSION IN IMPLANT-AT A GLANCE","authors":"K. Mishra, D. Hegde, S. Shetty, Sanjana Shah, S. Sreeram, S. Reddy","doi":"10.19177/JRD.V8E2202021-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Occlusion is a critical and very important component for the clinical success and longevity of dental implants. This review article focuses on the various aspects of implant protective occlusion. Our scientific literature regarding implant occlusion, particularly in implant-supported fixed dental prostheses remains controversial. Materials and methods: A search strategy was performed in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar with keywords – ‘implants’ and ‘occlusion’, ‘implants’ and ‘fixed prosthesis, ‘implants’ and ‘fixed dental prostheses’, ‘implants’ and ‘partial edentulism’, ‘implants’ and ‘complications’, ‘implants’ and ‘failures’, ‘implants’ and ‘cantilever’, ‘implants’ and ‘occlusal load’. Results: 135 articles were retrieved. After hand search a total of 290 articles were identified. Ultimately, 30 articles were selected and summarized and discussed as they met the selection criteria. Conclusion: Most of the available clinical data are controversial. Implant-protected occlusion can be accomplished by decreasing the width of the occlusal table and improving the direction of force. By doing these things, we can minimize overload on bone-implant interfaces and implant prostheses, to maintain an implant load within the physiological limits of individualized occlusion, and ultimately provide long-term stability of implants and implant prostheses. Current clinical practices rely heavily on principles extracted from the natural dentition or removable dental prostheses on complete edentulous patients and on expert opinions.","PeriodicalId":213881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","volume":"38 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19177/JRD.V8E2202021-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Occlusion is a critical and very important component for the clinical success and longevity of dental implants. This review article focuses on the various aspects of implant protective occlusion. Our scientific literature regarding implant occlusion, particularly in implant-supported fixed dental prostheses remains controversial. Materials and methods: A search strategy was performed in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar with keywords – ‘implants’ and ‘occlusion’, ‘implants’ and ‘fixed prosthesis, ‘implants’ and ‘fixed dental prostheses’, ‘implants’ and ‘partial edentulism’, ‘implants’ and ‘complications’, ‘implants’ and ‘failures’, ‘implants’ and ‘cantilever’, ‘implants’ and ‘occlusal load’. Results: 135 articles were retrieved. After hand search a total of 290 articles were identified. Ultimately, 30 articles were selected and summarized and discussed as they met the selection criteria. Conclusion: Most of the available clinical data are controversial. Implant-protected occlusion can be accomplished by decreasing the width of the occlusal table and improving the direction of force. By doing these things, we can minimize overload on bone-implant interfaces and implant prostheses, to maintain an implant load within the physiological limits of individualized occlusion, and ultimately provide long-term stability of implants and implant prostheses. Current clinical practices rely heavily on principles extracted from the natural dentition or removable dental prostheses on complete edentulous patients and on expert opinions.
咬合在种植体-一眼
目的:牙合是种植体临床成功和寿命的重要组成部分。本文综述了种植体保护性咬合的各个方面。我们关于种植体咬合的科学文献,特别是种植体支持的固定义齿仍然存在争议。材料和方法:在MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus和Google Scholar中搜索关键词:“种植体”和“咬合”,“种植体”和“固定假体”,“种植体”和“固定牙齿假体”,“种植体”和“部分牙髓”,“种植体”和“并发症”,“种植体”和“失败”,“种植体”和“悬臂”,“种植体”和“咬合负荷”。结果:共检索到135篇文献。经手工检索,共鉴定出290篇文章。最终选出了30篇文章,并对它们进行了总结和讨论,因为它们符合选择标准。结论:大多数现有的临床资料存在争议。通过减小咬合台的宽度和改善力的方向,可以实现种植体保护的咬合。通过这些工作,我们可以最大限度地减少骨-种植体界面和种植体假体的负荷,使种植体负荷保持在个体化咬合的生理限度内,最终提供种植体和种植体假体的长期稳定性。目前的临床实践在很大程度上依赖于从天然牙列或可移动的义齿中提取的原理,以及专家的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信