Do Normative Predictions Make Sense? Pragmatism and Ethics in Calderoni

Giovanni Tuzet
{"title":"Do Normative Predictions Make Sense? Pragmatism and Ethics in Calderoni","authors":"Giovanni Tuzet","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2900313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work deals with the applicability of Peirce’s pragmatic maxim to normative concepts, defining them in terms of predictions. The starting point is the work of Mario Calderoni (1879-1914), an Italian pragmatist who tried to apply pragmatism to ethical and legal issues. The conclusion of the paper is that it does not make sense to make normative predictions with a definitional purpose, that is, for the purpose of defining a normative concept, although it does make sense for cognitive ends, that is, for the purpose of knowing what will (probably) happen following the application or misapplication of certain norms.","PeriodicalId":211279,"journal":{"name":"The Italian Pragmatists","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Italian Pragmatists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2900313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The work deals with the applicability of Peirce’s pragmatic maxim to normative concepts, defining them in terms of predictions. The starting point is the work of Mario Calderoni (1879-1914), an Italian pragmatist who tried to apply pragmatism to ethical and legal issues. The conclusion of the paper is that it does not make sense to make normative predictions with a definitional purpose, that is, for the purpose of defining a normative concept, although it does make sense for cognitive ends, that is, for the purpose of knowing what will (probably) happen following the application or misapplication of certain norms.
规范性预测有意义吗?卡尔德隆尼的实用主义与伦理学
这项工作涉及Peirce的实用主义格言对规范性概念的适用性,并根据预测对其进行定义。出发点是马里奥·卡尔德罗尼(Mario Calderoni, 1879-1914)的著作,他是一位意大利实用主义者,试图将实用主义应用于伦理和法律问题。本文的结论是,为了定义一个规范性概念而进行规范性预测是没有意义的,尽管它对于认知目的是有意义的,也就是说,为了知道在应用或误用某些规范之后会(可能)发生什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信