Designing international public sector accounting standards: An analysis of constituents’ participation through comment letters

IF 3.1 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Marco Bisogno, Francesca Manes-Rossi, Mariafrancesca Sicilia
{"title":"Designing international public sector accounting standards: An analysis of constituents’ participation through comment letters","authors":"Marco Bisogno,&nbsp;Francesca Manes-Rossi,&nbsp;Mariafrancesca Sicilia","doi":"10.1111/faam.12343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Harmonization of public sector accounting is attracting increasing attention from scholars and practitioners. A focal component of this phenomenon is the setting of accounting standards, whose legitimacy is paramount to their application. As participation by constituents is considered fundamental for ensuring this legitimacy, in this study, we focus on participation through comment letters in the due process. In particular, we explore the type of respondents, their geographical area, their agreement/disagreement with the documents prepared by the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) and the issues of importance to them, through an analysis of the comment letters submitted for six projects launched over the period 2017–2020 by the IPSASB. Furthermore, we analyze some factors that may affect countries’ participation in the due process. The analysis enriches our understanding of the IPSASB's due process and provides relevant insights for the growing research into accounting standard-setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":47120,"journal":{"name":"Financial Accountability & Management","volume":"38 4","pages":"661-685"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faam.12343","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Accountability & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faam.12343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Harmonization of public sector accounting is attracting increasing attention from scholars and practitioners. A focal component of this phenomenon is the setting of accounting standards, whose legitimacy is paramount to their application. As participation by constituents is considered fundamental for ensuring this legitimacy, in this study, we focus on participation through comment letters in the due process. In particular, we explore the type of respondents, their geographical area, their agreement/disagreement with the documents prepared by the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) and the issues of importance to them, through an analysis of the comment letters submitted for six projects launched over the period 2017–2020 by the IPSASB. Furthermore, we analyze some factors that may affect countries’ participation in the due process. The analysis enriches our understanding of the IPSASB's due process and provides relevant insights for the growing research into accounting standard-setting.

设计国际公共部门会计准则:通过意见信分析选民的参与
公共部门会计的协调越来越受到学者和从业者的关注。这种现象的一个焦点部分是会计准则的制定,其合法性对其应用至关重要。由于选民的参与被认为是确保这种合法性的基础,在本研究中,我们将重点放在通过正当程序中的评论信参与。通过对国际公共部门会计准则理事会(IPSASB)在2017-2020年期间启动的六个项目提交的意见函的分析,我们特别探讨了受访者的类型、他们的地理区域、他们对IPSASB准备的文件的同意/不同意以及对他们重要的问题。此外,我们还分析了可能影响各国参与正当程序的一些因素。该分析丰富了我们对IPSASB正当程序的理解,并为日益增长的会计准则制定研究提供了相关见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信