The Viewpoint’s Assessment of Physicians About Radiology Reports of Medical Imaging Unit in Kermanshah

Sogand Abbasi Azizi, M. Tohidnia, Ali Khanzadeh Moghaddam, M. Zhaleh
{"title":"The Viewpoint’s Assessment of Physicians About Radiology Reports of Medical Imaging Unit in Kermanshah","authors":"Sogand Abbasi Azizi, M. Tohidnia, Ali Khanzadeh Moghaddam, M. Zhaleh","doi":"10.5812/jcrps-121261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Radiology reports are the data obtained from radiography films which as the final and one of the main criteria of service in medical imaging centers, are the only linkage between the radiologist, physicians, and patients. This method is also a usual approach in the transfer of diagnostic data to the physicians. Methods: In this descriptive-cross sectional study, the research community included specialists working in public and private centers of Kermanshah province. A questionnaire including two sections of demographic data (age, sex, specialty, work experience, workplace and level of education) and the questions related to the role of the radiologist and necessary of report providing, quality of reports, radiographic film interpretation ability and attention to request content and in- time delivery of the reports, was investigated. The data were finally analyzed by STATA 11 software. Results: In this study, the opinions of 240 specialists from 14 specialties were examined. Among them, 64.2% were men, 92.2% of them were specialists, 45.5% were working in public centers and 42.5% of them had less than 10 years of work experience. The results showed that 63.3% of the physicians trusted radiologic reports for more than 50%. Among the scopes, the highest score was for the role of the radiologist in preparation of reports, and the lowest mean was obtained for the ability to interpret the radiological film. A comparison of the four scopes with assumed means showed no significant differences (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Regarding the percentage of total attitude score, the studied specialists had a relatively desirable attitude toward the radiological reports. The complexity of medical imaging techniques and their role in in-time disease diagnosis and treatment requires improvement of the relationship between the radiologists and non-radiologists physicians.","PeriodicalId":254271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Research in Paramedical Sciences","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Research in Paramedical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jcrps-121261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radiology reports are the data obtained from radiography films which as the final and one of the main criteria of service in medical imaging centers, are the only linkage between the radiologist, physicians, and patients. This method is also a usual approach in the transfer of diagnostic data to the physicians. Methods: In this descriptive-cross sectional study, the research community included specialists working in public and private centers of Kermanshah province. A questionnaire including two sections of demographic data (age, sex, specialty, work experience, workplace and level of education) and the questions related to the role of the radiologist and necessary of report providing, quality of reports, radiographic film interpretation ability and attention to request content and in- time delivery of the reports, was investigated. The data were finally analyzed by STATA 11 software. Results: In this study, the opinions of 240 specialists from 14 specialties were examined. Among them, 64.2% were men, 92.2% of them were specialists, 45.5% were working in public centers and 42.5% of them had less than 10 years of work experience. The results showed that 63.3% of the physicians trusted radiologic reports for more than 50%. Among the scopes, the highest score was for the role of the radiologist in preparation of reports, and the lowest mean was obtained for the ability to interpret the radiological film. A comparison of the four scopes with assumed means showed no significant differences (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Regarding the percentage of total attitude score, the studied specialists had a relatively desirable attitude toward the radiological reports. The complexity of medical imaging techniques and their role in in-time disease diagnosis and treatment requires improvement of the relationship between the radiologists and non-radiologists physicians.
克尔曼沙医学影像科医师对放射学报告的观点评价
背景:放射学报告是从影像学胶片中获得的数据,是医学影像中心服务的最终和主要标准之一,是放射科医生、医生和患者之间的唯一联系。这种方法也是将诊断数据传递给医生的常用方法。方法:在这个描述性横断面研究中,研究团体包括在克尔曼沙阿省的公共和私人中心工作的专家。调查问卷包括两部分人口统计数据(年龄、性别、专业、工作经历、工作场所和教育程度),以及与放射科医生的作用和提供报告的必要性、报告质量、放射片解读能力以及对要求内容的关注和报告的及时交付有关的问题。最后用stata11软件对数据进行分析。结果:本研究对来自14个专科的240名专科医生的意见进行了调查。其中,64.2%是男性,92.2%是专家,45.5%在公共中心工作,42.5%的人工作经验不足10年。结果显示,63.3%的医师对放射学报告的信任度在50%以上。在这些范围中,放射科医生在准备报告方面的作用得分最高,对放射片的解释能力得分最低。四种范围与假设平均值的比较没有显着差异(P = 0.001)。结论:从态度总得分的百分比来看,受访专科医师对放射学报告的态度较为满意。医学影像技术的复杂性及其在疾病及时诊断和治疗中的作用要求改善放射科医师和非放射科医师之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信