Coalitions of the Willing and the Shared Responsibility to Protect

Toni Erskine
{"title":"Coalitions of the Willing and the Shared Responsibility to Protect","authors":"Toni Erskine","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198800613.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been widespread support for the idea that the so-called ‘international community’ has a remedial moral responsibility to protect vulnerable populations from mass atrocities when their own governments fail to do so. Moreover, military intervention may, when necessary, be one means of discharging this proposed ‘responsibility to protect’ or, more colloquially, ‘R2P’. But, where exactly is this responsibility located? In other words, which body or bodies can be expected to discharge a duty to safeguard those who lack the protection of—or, indeed, come under threat from—their own government? In this chapter, I propose ‘coalitions of the willing’ as one (likely provocative) answer to this question, and explore how the informal nature of such associations should inform the judgements of moral responsibility that we make in relation to them. Perhaps most controversially, I suggest that, under certain circumstances, states and other entities each have a duty to contribute to establishing such an ad hoc association.","PeriodicalId":332779,"journal":{"name":"The State and Cosmopolitan Responsibilities","volume":"84 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The State and Cosmopolitan Responsibilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198800613.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There has been widespread support for the idea that the so-called ‘international community’ has a remedial moral responsibility to protect vulnerable populations from mass atrocities when their own governments fail to do so. Moreover, military intervention may, when necessary, be one means of discharging this proposed ‘responsibility to protect’ or, more colloquially, ‘R2P’. But, where exactly is this responsibility located? In other words, which body or bodies can be expected to discharge a duty to safeguard those who lack the protection of—or, indeed, come under threat from—their own government? In this chapter, I propose ‘coalitions of the willing’ as one (likely provocative) answer to this question, and explore how the informal nature of such associations should inform the judgements of moral responsibility that we make in relation to them. Perhaps most controversially, I suggest that, under certain circumstances, states and other entities each have a duty to contribute to establishing such an ad hoc association.
自愿联盟和共同保护责任
有一种观点得到了广泛的支持,即所谓的“国际社会”有一种补救性的道德责任,即当他们自己的政府没有这样做时,保护弱势群体免受大规模暴行的侵害。此外,在必要时,军事干预可能是履行所提议的“保护责任”或更通俗地说,“R2P”的一种手段。但是,这个责任到底在哪里呢?换句话说,哪一个或哪几个机构可以被期望履行职责,保护那些缺乏保护的人——或者,实际上,受到本国政府威胁的人?在本章中,我提出了“意愿联盟”作为这个问题的一个(可能是挑衅性的)答案,并探讨了这种协会的非正式性质应该如何告知我们对道德责任的判断。也许最具争议的是,我建议,在某些情况下,国家和其他实体都有责任为建立这样一个特设协会作出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信