Optimization of firefighting strategies in process plants with emphasis on domino effects and safe evacuation

N. Khakzad, Chao Chen, G. Reniers, Paul Amyotte
{"title":"Optimization of firefighting strategies in process plants with emphasis on domino effects and safe evacuation","authors":"N. Khakzad, Chao Chen, G. Reniers, Paul Amyotte","doi":"10.1002/cjce.25089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective firefighting and evacuation are integral parts of emergency response plans in process plants, which play a key role in protecting human lives and assets in the event of major fires. Given sufficient firefighting resources, firefighters would suppress all the burning vessels and cool off all the exposed vessels in order to contain the fire and prevent a fire‐induced domino effect. However, when the number of critical units—whether on fire or exposed to fire—exceeds the firefighting resources, firefighters should decide how to optimally allocate the resources so as to best satisfy the safety goals. To facilitate such decisions, the present work aims to develop a methodology for effective firefighting under insufficient resources. The methodology seeks out two safety goals via optimal firefighting strategies: (1) providing for the safety of evacuees, and (2) reducing the risk of domino effects. Although both safety goals are attempted to be satisfied at the same time, a higher priority is assigned to the first goal as long as the evacuation is underway. When the evacuation is complete, all the resources are focused on the second goal. The study shows that a multi‐objective optimization approach to identifying firefighting plans outdoes single‐objective optimization approaches in that several safety goals could be met at once. Although only two safety goals are considered in the present study, the methodology is flexible enough to accommodate several goals such as safety of offsite people and assets.","PeriodicalId":276433,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.25089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective firefighting and evacuation are integral parts of emergency response plans in process plants, which play a key role in protecting human lives and assets in the event of major fires. Given sufficient firefighting resources, firefighters would suppress all the burning vessels and cool off all the exposed vessels in order to contain the fire and prevent a fire‐induced domino effect. However, when the number of critical units—whether on fire or exposed to fire—exceeds the firefighting resources, firefighters should decide how to optimally allocate the resources so as to best satisfy the safety goals. To facilitate such decisions, the present work aims to develop a methodology for effective firefighting under insufficient resources. The methodology seeks out two safety goals via optimal firefighting strategies: (1) providing for the safety of evacuees, and (2) reducing the risk of domino effects. Although both safety goals are attempted to be satisfied at the same time, a higher priority is assigned to the first goal as long as the evacuation is underway. When the evacuation is complete, all the resources are focused on the second goal. The study shows that a multi‐objective optimization approach to identifying firefighting plans outdoes single‐objective optimization approaches in that several safety goals could be met at once. Although only two safety goals are considered in the present study, the methodology is flexible enough to accommodate several goals such as safety of offsite people and assets.
以多米诺效应和安全疏散为重点的工艺装置消防策略优化
有效的灭火和疏散是加工工厂应急响应计划的组成部分,在发生重大火灾时对保护人员生命和财产起着关键作用。如果有足够的消防资源,消防员会压制所有燃烧的船只,并冷却所有暴露的船只,以控制火势,防止火灾引起的多米诺骨牌效应。然而,当着火或暴露在火灾中的关键单元数量超过消防资源时,消防人员必须决定如何优化分配资源,以最大限度地满足安全目标。为了促进这种决定,目前的工作旨在制定一种在资源不足的情况下有效灭火的方法。该方法通过最佳消防策略寻求两个安全目标:(1)提供撤离人员的安全,(2)减少多米诺骨牌效应的风险。尽管这两个安全目标都试图同时得到满足,但只要疏散正在进行,第一个目标就会被赋予更高的优先级。当疏散完成后,所有的资源都集中在第二个目标上。研究表明,确定消防计划的多目标优化方法优于单目标优化方法,因为可以同时满足多个安全目标。虽然在本研究中只考虑了两个安全目标,但该方法足够灵活,可以适应多个目标,如非现场人员和资产的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信