ANALISIS GANTI KERUGIAN TERHADAP KORBAN SALAH TANGKAP

Fajjrul Nur Ilham, Ahmad Mahyani
{"title":"ANALISIS GANTI KERUGIAN TERHADAP KORBAN SALAH TANGKAP","authors":"Fajjrul Nur Ilham, Ahmad Mahyani","doi":"10.53363/bureau.v2i3.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investigators are at the forefront of an initial process of examining criminal cases, which then if the files are in accordance with the delegation of case files will proceed to the trial stage conducted by the prosecutor. In carrying out their duties, the Indonesian National Police or investigators must act fairly and wisely in determining the truth of a criminal case. One of the duties of the Indonesian National Police is to conduct an investigation. The investigation process is an examination mechanism in criminal cases that functions to seek sufficient information, as well as to find and collect valid evidence regarding the case and to find the suspect, this is stated in Article 1 Paragraph 2 of Law Number 8 of 1981 KUHAP. To be able to convict a defendant, there are at least two valid pieces of evidence. Evidence is regulated in Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, valid evidence is: a. witness testimony; b. expert testimony; c. letter; d. instruction; e. defendant's statement. But in reality, at this time there are many cases of wrongful arrests that occur, from this it can be concluded that the beginning of this wrong arrest case is in the investigation process carried out by police investigators to the role of judges to decide cases in court. This research has the aim of how the legal protection carried out by the state in terms of compensation for victims of wrongful arrests to get justice and their rights after a case of wrong arrest occurs","PeriodicalId":345865,"journal":{"name":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i3.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investigators are at the forefront of an initial process of examining criminal cases, which then if the files are in accordance with the delegation of case files will proceed to the trial stage conducted by the prosecutor. In carrying out their duties, the Indonesian National Police or investigators must act fairly and wisely in determining the truth of a criminal case. One of the duties of the Indonesian National Police is to conduct an investigation. The investigation process is an examination mechanism in criminal cases that functions to seek sufficient information, as well as to find and collect valid evidence regarding the case and to find the suspect, this is stated in Article 1 Paragraph 2 of Law Number 8 of 1981 KUHAP. To be able to convict a defendant, there are at least two valid pieces of evidence. Evidence is regulated in Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, valid evidence is: a. witness testimony; b. expert testimony; c. letter; d. instruction; e. defendant's statement. But in reality, at this time there are many cases of wrongful arrests that occur, from this it can be concluded that the beginning of this wrong arrest case is in the investigation process carried out by police investigators to the role of judges to decide cases in court. This research has the aim of how the legal protection carried out by the state in terms of compensation for victims of wrongful arrests to get justice and their rights after a case of wrong arrest occurs
这是对被错误抓获受害者的损害赔偿金的分析
调查人员处于审查刑事案件的初步程序的最前线,然后,如果档案符合案件档案的授权,将进入由检察官进行的审判阶段。印度尼西亚国家警察或调查人员在履行其职责时,必须公平和明智地确定刑事案件的真相。印度尼西亚国家警察的职责之一是进行调查。调查程序是刑事案件中的一种审查机制,其功能是寻求充分的资料,以及寻找和收集有关案件的有效证据和找到嫌疑人,这一点载于1981年KUHAP第8号法律第1条第2款。要给被告定罪,至少要有两项有效证据。《刑事诉讼法》第184条第1款规定,有效证据是:a.证人证言;B.专家证词;c .信;d .指令;E.被告的陈述。但在现实中,此时发生了许多错误逮捕的案件,由此可以得出结论,这种错误逮捕案件的开始是在调查过程中由警察调查员到法官在法庭上判决案件的作用。本研究旨在探讨错误逮捕案件发生后,国家如何在赔偿方面对错误逮捕受害人伸张正义及其权利进行法律保护
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信