Cluster validation techniques for Bibliographic databases

S. Mishra, S. Saha, S. Mondal
{"title":"Cluster validation techniques for Bibliographic databases","authors":"S. Mishra, S. Saha, S. Mondal","doi":"10.1109/TECHSYM.2014.6807921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In entity name disambiguation technique, records of same entity are clustered together. One of the major challenges in such technique is to validate the result as the actual or correct results are often not known or difficult to know. In this context, three commonly known evaluation measures are precision, recall and f-measure. All these indices are external validity indices as they all need gold standard data. But in Bibliographic databases like DBLP, Arnetminer, Scopus, Web of Science etc., obtaining golden standard is very difficult for each entity. So, there is a need to use some other metrics to evaluate the performance on Bibliographic data. In this paper, a novel scheme based on internal validity index is used to evaluate the performance of entity name disambiguation algorithm. Several distance measures are used here to compute the similarity between two records. These functions are then incorporated in the definitions of internal validity indices.","PeriodicalId":265072,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Students' Technology Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Students' Technology Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TECHSYM.2014.6807921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In entity name disambiguation technique, records of same entity are clustered together. One of the major challenges in such technique is to validate the result as the actual or correct results are often not known or difficult to know. In this context, three commonly known evaluation measures are precision, recall and f-measure. All these indices are external validity indices as they all need gold standard data. But in Bibliographic databases like DBLP, Arnetminer, Scopus, Web of Science etc., obtaining golden standard is very difficult for each entity. So, there is a need to use some other metrics to evaluate the performance on Bibliographic data. In this paper, a novel scheme based on internal validity index is used to evaluate the performance of entity name disambiguation algorithm. Several distance measures are used here to compute the similarity between two records. These functions are then incorporated in the definitions of internal validity indices.
书目数据库的聚类验证技术
在实体名称消歧技术中,将同一实体的记录聚类在一起。这种技术的主要挑战之一是验证结果,因为实际或正确的结果通常不知道或难以知道。在这种情况下,三种常见的评价指标是精度、召回率和f-measure。所有这些指标都是外部效度指标,因为它们都需要金标准数据。但在DBLP、Arnetminer、Scopus、Web of Science等书目数据库中,每个实体都很难获得黄金标准。因此,有必要使用一些其他指标来评估书目数据的性能。本文提出了一种基于内部有效性指标的实体名称消歧算法性能评价方案。这里使用几个距离度量来计算两个记录之间的相似性。然后将这些函数合并到内部有效性指数的定义中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信