The impacts of firm-level and country-level variables on Environmental, social and corporate governance greenwashing

Duygu Erol, Serkan Cankaya
{"title":"The impacts of firm-level and country-level variables on Environmental, social and corporate governance greenwashing","authors":"Duygu Erol, Serkan Cankaya","doi":"10.46928/iticusbe.1200111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nWhile ESG investments have increased in the last 10 years, stakeholders are curious about the correctness of the ESG claims of companies. Greenwashing (GW) is a conscious and selective information disclosure of firms to create a positive image in the eyes of the stakeholders. It limits the integration of ESG data into investments as the stakeholders lose their trust in that declarations. Unaudited sustainability reports, lack of standardization in disclosure rules of ESG data, and the absence of a global governance body to ensure the accuracy of reported ESG information increase the risk of GW behaviors. \nPurpose: The motivation of this study is to help out stakeholders to determine which company factors (size, profitability, board structure, governance model) and country factors (corruption, unemployment, wealth of the society) impact the ESG greenwashing behaviors within STOXX 600. \nMethod: We implemented a panel regression model. The dataset covers STOXX 600 firms from 2009-2020. \nFindings: The results show that each ESG GW dimension is impacted by a different company and country variables. An increase in CSR committee and embedding sustainable factors into the Executive remuneration are two main factors that decrease all three dimensions of GW behaviors. Company governance and financial factors have more impact on the GW compared to the country factors. \nOriginality: According to our knowledge, this is the first research that evaluates each greenwashing dimension at the firm and country levels.","PeriodicalId":179518,"journal":{"name":"İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.1200111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract While ESG investments have increased in the last 10 years, stakeholders are curious about the correctness of the ESG claims of companies. Greenwashing (GW) is a conscious and selective information disclosure of firms to create a positive image in the eyes of the stakeholders. It limits the integration of ESG data into investments as the stakeholders lose their trust in that declarations. Unaudited sustainability reports, lack of standardization in disclosure rules of ESG data, and the absence of a global governance body to ensure the accuracy of reported ESG information increase the risk of GW behaviors. Purpose: The motivation of this study is to help out stakeholders to determine which company factors (size, profitability, board structure, governance model) and country factors (corruption, unemployment, wealth of the society) impact the ESG greenwashing behaviors within STOXX 600. Method: We implemented a panel regression model. The dataset covers STOXX 600 firms from 2009-2020. Findings: The results show that each ESG GW dimension is impacted by a different company and country variables. An increase in CSR committee and embedding sustainable factors into the Executive remuneration are two main factors that decrease all three dimensions of GW behaviors. Company governance and financial factors have more impact on the GW compared to the country factors. Originality: According to our knowledge, this is the first research that evaluates each greenwashing dimension at the firm and country levels.
企业层面和国家层面变量对环境、社会和公司治理“漂绿”的影响
虽然ESG投资在过去10年有所增加,但利益相关者对公司ESG主张的正确性感到好奇。“洗绿”是企业为了在利益相关者眼中塑造正面形象而进行的有意识的、有选择性的信息披露。它限制了将ESG数据整合到投资中,因为利益相关者对这些声明失去了信任。未经审计的可持续发展报告,缺乏规范的ESG数据披露规则,以及缺乏全球治理机构来确保报告ESG信息的准确性,增加了GW行为的风险。目的:本研究的动机是帮助利益相关者确定哪些公司因素(规模、盈利能力、董事会结构、治理模式)和国家因素(腐败、失业、社会财富)影响斯托克600指数内的ESG洗绿行为。方法:采用面板回归模型。该数据集涵盖了2009年至2020年的斯托克600指数成分股公司。研究结果表明,ESG GW的每个维度都受到不同公司和国家变量的影响。企业社会责任委员会的增加和在高管薪酬中嵌入可持续因素是降低企业社会责任行为三个维度的两个主要因素。与国家因素相比,公司治理和财务因素对GW的影响更大。原创性:据我们所知,这是第一个在公司和国家层面上评估每个绿色洗涤维度的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信