The effect of ARBs and ACEIs on SARS-CoV-2: Exploring the controversy

Seleem Badawy, Benjamin Miller
{"title":"The effect of ARBs and ACEIs on SARS-CoV-2: Exploring the controversy","authors":"Seleem Badawy, Benjamin Miller","doi":"10.17975/sfj-2022-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the COVID-19 pandemic spread quickly across the world, one of the largest emerging debates in the science community was surrounding the risk of COVID-19 (also referred to as SARS-CoV-2) as an effect of the regular use of anti-hypertensive medications. In this article, this debate and the controversy that followed will be analyzed by outlining the elements of the biological system involved, then analyzing its importance, the implicated arguments, and the controversy itself.","PeriodicalId":268438,"journal":{"name":"STEM Fellowship Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STEM Fellowship Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17975/sfj-2022-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the COVID-19 pandemic spread quickly across the world, one of the largest emerging debates in the science community was surrounding the risk of COVID-19 (also referred to as SARS-CoV-2) as an effect of the regular use of anti-hypertensive medications. In this article, this debate and the controversy that followed will be analyzed by outlining the elements of the biological system involved, then analyzing its importance, the implicated arguments, and the controversy itself.
arb和acei对SARS-CoV-2的影响:探讨争议
随着COVID-19大流行在全球迅速蔓延,科学界最大的新辩论之一是围绕定期使用抗高血压药物导致COVID-19(也称为SARS-CoV-2)的风险。在本文中,将通过概述所涉及的生物系统的要素,然后分析其重要性,隐含的论点和争议本身来分析这场辩论和随后的争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信