Problems of concluding an expert opinion based on the results of a forensic veterinary examination of a live animal and ways to solve them

I. Yatsenko
{"title":"Problems of concluding an expert opinion based on the results of a forensic veterinary examination of a live animal and ways to solve them","authors":"I. Yatsenko","doi":"10.31548/law2022.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forensic veterinary examination is a new type of forensic examination that is actively developing in the forensic examination institutions of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. Since its theory and methodology are yet forming, there is a need to develop its terminology, methods, and means of conducting and formalizing research results. The purpose of this study was to single out the problematic issues of drafting an expert’s opinion based on the results of a forensic veterinary examination of a live animal and to outline ways to solve them. The study employed various scientific methods, namely dialectical, methods of logic (formal legal, system-structural analysis, modelling, analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction), general cognitive methods (description, observation), special methods, the functions of which are performed by methods of lifetime clinical forensic veterinary diagnostics of animals. The present paper focuses on the fact that the specific feature of the introductory part of the conclusion of a forensic expert is that it indicates the object of examination – a live animal. A list of issues to be resolved by the authorized body or person who appointed the forensic veterinary examination was developed in this study. The structure of the investigative part of the forensic expert’s opinion was covered and substantiated for the first time, which is based on a forensic veterinary examination of the subject animal based on the principle of analysing the state of individual body systems, including blood circulation, breathing, urination, sexual, nervous, and sensory. The description in the expert opinion of the results of the analysis of individual veterinary documents concerning the subject of proof was substantiated. It was shown that based on the results of the clinical forensic-veterinary examination of a live animal under expert examination, the forensic expert outlines the forensic-veterinary diagnosis, and in the section of the examination part of the opinion, which synthesizes the results, summarizes the obtained data. It is stated that the final part of the forensic expert opinion contains comprehensive, scientifically sound, consistently laid out, clear, specific, expressive, understandable answers to the questions raised, the list of which is indicated in the introductory part of the opinion. The present paper outlined the structure of appendices to the opinion of a forensic expert, which is most often photo illustrations of injuries found in an animal under examination. The solutions developed in this paper concerning the drafting of an expert’s opinion based on the results of a forensic veterinary examination of a live animal are guaranteed to be reflected in the conduct and drafting of the results of forensic veterinary research.","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law. Human. Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2022.04.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forensic veterinary examination is a new type of forensic examination that is actively developing in the forensic examination institutions of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. Since its theory and methodology are yet forming, there is a need to develop its terminology, methods, and means of conducting and formalizing research results. The purpose of this study was to single out the problematic issues of drafting an expert’s opinion based on the results of a forensic veterinary examination of a live animal and to outline ways to solve them. The study employed various scientific methods, namely dialectical, methods of logic (formal legal, system-structural analysis, modelling, analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction), general cognitive methods (description, observation), special methods, the functions of which are performed by methods of lifetime clinical forensic veterinary diagnostics of animals. The present paper focuses on the fact that the specific feature of the introductory part of the conclusion of a forensic expert is that it indicates the object of examination – a live animal. A list of issues to be resolved by the authorized body or person who appointed the forensic veterinary examination was developed in this study. The structure of the investigative part of the forensic expert’s opinion was covered and substantiated for the first time, which is based on a forensic veterinary examination of the subject animal based on the principle of analysing the state of individual body systems, including blood circulation, breathing, urination, sexual, nervous, and sensory. The description in the expert opinion of the results of the analysis of individual veterinary documents concerning the subject of proof was substantiated. It was shown that based on the results of the clinical forensic-veterinary examination of a live animal under expert examination, the forensic expert outlines the forensic-veterinary diagnosis, and in the section of the examination part of the opinion, which synthesizes the results, summarizes the obtained data. It is stated that the final part of the forensic expert opinion contains comprehensive, scientifically sound, consistently laid out, clear, specific, expressive, understandable answers to the questions raised, the list of which is indicated in the introductory part of the opinion. The present paper outlined the structure of appendices to the opinion of a forensic expert, which is most often photo illustrations of injuries found in an animal under examination. The solutions developed in this paper concerning the drafting of an expert’s opinion based on the results of a forensic veterinary examination of a live animal are guaranteed to be reflected in the conduct and drafting of the results of forensic veterinary research.
根据活体动物法医检验结果得出专家意见的问题及解决方法
法医兽医检验是在乌克兰司法部的法医检验机构中积极发展的一种新型法医检验。由于其理论和方法论尚未形成,因此需要发展其术语,方法和手段来进行和形式化研究结果。本研究的目的是挑出根据活体动物的法医兽医检查结果起草专家意见的问题,并概述解决这些问题的方法。本研究采用了多种科学方法,即辩证方法、逻辑方法(形式法、系统结构分析、建模、分析、综合、归纳、演绎)、一般认知方法(描述、观察)、特殊方法,并通过动物终身临床法医兽医诊断方法发挥其功能。本文着重论述了法医鉴定结论导言部分的特点是指出了鉴定对象——活的动物。本研究制定了一份由指定法医兽医检查的授权机构或人员解决的问题清单。法医专家意见的调查部分的结构首次被涵盖和证实,这是基于基于分析个体身体系统状态的原则对主题动物进行的法医兽医检查,包括血液循环、呼吸、排尿、性、神经和感觉。专家意见中对有关证明主题的个别兽医文件分析结果的描述得到了证实。结果表明,法医专家根据对活体动物进行临床法医鉴定的结果,对鉴定结果进行了概括,并在鉴定意见部分对鉴定结果进行了综合,总结了获得的资料。有人指出,法医专家意见的最后部分对提出的问题作出了全面、科学合理、始终如一、明确、具体、富有表现力和可理解的答复,其清单载于意见的导言部分。本论文概述了法医专家意见附录的结构,这通常是在检查中发现的动物受伤的照片插图。本文提出的基于活体动物法医兽医检验结果起草专家意见的解决方案,保证在法医兽医研究结果的实施和起草中得到体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信