A Comparative Study of Access Control Languages

Sathish Pinagapani, Dianxiang Xu, Jun Kong
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Access Control Languages","authors":"Sathish Pinagapani, Dianxiang Xu, Jun Kong","doi":"10.1109/SSIRI.2009.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we compare three open source access control languages, XACML, JAAS and Java ACL. In addition to a conceptual analysis, we use a web-based health care system as a common application, in which controlled access is implemented through each of the languages. We compare the languages using standard software metrics, such as reusability, policy expressiveness, extensibility, error handling, and programmatic control. The results of the comparative study indicate a high degree of variance in the three languages. They can serve as a useful guide for software developers to select an access control language that best meets their requirements.","PeriodicalId":196276,"journal":{"name":"2009 Third IEEE International Conference on Secure Software Integration and Reliability Improvement","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Third IEEE International Conference on Secure Software Integration and Reliability Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSIRI.2009.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, we compare three open source access control languages, XACML, JAAS and Java ACL. In addition to a conceptual analysis, we use a web-based health care system as a common application, in which controlled access is implemented through each of the languages. We compare the languages using standard software metrics, such as reusability, policy expressiveness, extensibility, error handling, and programmatic control. The results of the comparative study indicate a high degree of variance in the three languages. They can serve as a useful guide for software developers to select an access control language that best meets their requirements.
访问控制语言的比较研究
本文对XACML、JAAS和Java ACL三种开源访问控制语言进行了比较。除了概念分析之外,我们还使用基于web的医疗保健系统作为通用应用程序,其中通过每种语言实现受控访问。我们使用标准软件度量来比较语言,例如可重用性、策略表达性、可扩展性、错误处理和编程控制。比较研究的结果表明,三种语言之间存在很大的差异。它们可以作为软件开发人员选择最能满足其需求的访问控制语言的有用指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信