New framework for the development of clinical guidelines in Russia

D. Blinov, E. Akarachkova, A. Orlova, E. Kryukov, D. Korabelnikov
{"title":"New framework for the development of clinical guidelines in Russia","authors":"D. Blinov, E. Akarachkova, A. Orlova, E. Kryukov, D. Korabelnikov","doi":"10.17749/2070-4909.2019.12.2.125-144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim - based on the existing regulations and recent documents from the regulatory bodies, determine the methodology for the development of clinical guidelines (CG) that meet the requirements of the legislation in the Russian Federation. Materials and methods . We analyzed a number of regulatory and subordinate acts confirming the concept and status of the CG, in particular, the Federal Law № 323- ФЗ “On the principles of health care for citizens of the Russian Federation”, Federal Law № 489- ФЗ “On the amendments to article 40 of the Federal Law “On compulsory medical insurance in the Russian Federation” and the Federal Law “On the principles of health care for citizens of the Russian Federation” concerning clinical guidelines, Order № 102 н of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated 28 Feb 2019 “Regulations on the scientific and practical council of the Ministry of Health of Russia” and Order № 103 н of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation of 28 Feb 2019 “On Approval of the procedure and terms for the development of clinical guidelines and their revision, the model format of clinical guidelines and requirements to their structure, contents and scientific validity of the information included in the clinical guidelines”. In addition, we used the documents of regulatory bodies of the Russian Federation, expert opinions from medical professionals and non-profit organizations as well as leading opinions from public sources. Results . Order № 102 н of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation secured the right of the scientific and practical council to consider and decide on the CG. Order № 103 н of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation approved the procedure and deadlines for the development/revision of the CG; the typical format of CG; the requirements for the structure of CG, its contents and scientific validity of the information included in the CG. A step-by-step algorithm was created for the procedure and timing of CG development and update; the above documents elaborate on the requirements to the structure of CG, the contents and scientific validity of the information included. There are also comments on the development and design of each CG section (title page, table of contents, list of abbreviations, terms and definitions, brief information on the disease, diagnosis, treatment, medical rehabilitation, prevention and follow-up care, organization of medical care, additional information, criteria for assessing the quality of medical care, list of references, composition of the working group on the development and revision of the CG, methodology of the development of the CG, reference materials, algorithms for doctor’s actions, patient information, assessment scales, questionnaires, and other patient assessment tools). The recently adopted requirements for CG registration are compared with the previous methodological recommendations of the regulatory bodies. Discussion. The unification of treatment strategies and the use of evidence-based reasoning in the updated CG will improve the quality of medical care and have a positive impact on the medical insurance segment and the judicial decisions. However, the presented concept of CG has attracted a number of critical comments from representatives of the medical community and medical lawyers. For example, the updated regulatory acts do not specify the deadlines and algorithms for updating the CG; these acts do not address the coordination between various medical non-profit organizations although such coordination is needed to avoid work duplication; the acts determine no specific resources required for the CG development (the latter flaw may have a negative impact on the quality and timing of the resulting CG). Some experts believe that it would be advisable to implement the system called GRADE. In addition, possible legal risks are analyzed in light of the fact that the CG are not regulatory legal documents. Conclusion. Periodic improvements in the CG renewing and approving procedure are an integral part of this large-scale process that introduces changes in the regulatory framework and clinical practice. Compulsory adherence to the CG is a due element of today’s high quality medical care.","PeriodicalId":201824,"journal":{"name":"FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomic and Pharmacoepidemiology","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomic and Pharmacoepidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909.2019.12.2.125-144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Aim - based on the existing regulations and recent documents from the regulatory bodies, determine the methodology for the development of clinical guidelines (CG) that meet the requirements of the legislation in the Russian Federation. Materials and methods . We analyzed a number of regulatory and subordinate acts confirming the concept and status of the CG, in particular, the Federal Law № 323- ФЗ “On the principles of health care for citizens of the Russian Federation”, Federal Law № 489- ФЗ “On the amendments to article 40 of the Federal Law “On compulsory medical insurance in the Russian Federation” and the Federal Law “On the principles of health care for citizens of the Russian Federation” concerning clinical guidelines, Order № 102 н of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated 28 Feb 2019 “Regulations on the scientific and practical council of the Ministry of Health of Russia” and Order № 103 н of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation of 28 Feb 2019 “On Approval of the procedure and terms for the development of clinical guidelines and their revision, the model format of clinical guidelines and requirements to their structure, contents and scientific validity of the information included in the clinical guidelines”. In addition, we used the documents of regulatory bodies of the Russian Federation, expert opinions from medical professionals and non-profit organizations as well as leading opinions from public sources. Results . Order № 102 н of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation secured the right of the scientific and practical council to consider and decide on the CG. Order № 103 н of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation approved the procedure and deadlines for the development/revision of the CG; the typical format of CG; the requirements for the structure of CG, its contents and scientific validity of the information included in the CG. A step-by-step algorithm was created for the procedure and timing of CG development and update; the above documents elaborate on the requirements to the structure of CG, the contents and scientific validity of the information included. There are also comments on the development and design of each CG section (title page, table of contents, list of abbreviations, terms and definitions, brief information on the disease, diagnosis, treatment, medical rehabilitation, prevention and follow-up care, organization of medical care, additional information, criteria for assessing the quality of medical care, list of references, composition of the working group on the development and revision of the CG, methodology of the development of the CG, reference materials, algorithms for doctor’s actions, patient information, assessment scales, questionnaires, and other patient assessment tools). The recently adopted requirements for CG registration are compared with the previous methodological recommendations of the regulatory bodies. Discussion. The unification of treatment strategies and the use of evidence-based reasoning in the updated CG will improve the quality of medical care and have a positive impact on the medical insurance segment and the judicial decisions. However, the presented concept of CG has attracted a number of critical comments from representatives of the medical community and medical lawyers. For example, the updated regulatory acts do not specify the deadlines and algorithms for updating the CG; these acts do not address the coordination between various medical non-profit organizations although such coordination is needed to avoid work duplication; the acts determine no specific resources required for the CG development (the latter flaw may have a negative impact on the quality and timing of the resulting CG). Some experts believe that it would be advisable to implement the system called GRADE. In addition, possible legal risks are analyzed in light of the fact that the CG are not regulatory legal documents. Conclusion. Periodic improvements in the CG renewing and approving procedure are an integral part of this large-scale process that introduces changes in the regulatory framework and clinical practice. Compulsory adherence to the CG is a due element of today’s high quality medical care.
俄罗斯临床指南发展的新框架
目的-根据现有法规和监管机构的最新文件,确定制定符合俄罗斯联邦立法要求的临床指南(CG)的方法。材料和方法。我们分析了一些确认CG概念和地位的监管和附属法案,特别是第323- ФЗ号联邦法“关于俄罗斯联邦公民的医疗保健原则”,第489- ФЗ号联邦法“关于修改联邦法第40条“关于俄罗斯联邦强制性医疗保险”和联邦法“关于俄罗斯联邦公民的医疗保健原则”的临床指南,2019年2月28日俄罗斯联邦卫生部第102号命令“俄罗斯卫生部科学和实践委员会条例”和2019年2月28日俄罗斯联邦卫生部第103号命令“关于批准制定临床指南的程序和条件及其修订,临床指南的示范格式及其结构要求,临床指南所包含信息的内容和科学有效性”。此外,我们使用了俄罗斯联邦监管机构的文件、医疗专业人员和非营利组织的专家意见以及公共来源的主要意见。结果。俄罗斯联邦卫生部第102号命令确保了科学和实践委员会审议和决定中央委员会的权利。俄罗斯联邦卫生部第103号命令批准了制定/修订《国家总方针》的程序和期限;CG的典型格式;对商品清单结构的要求、商品清单的内容以及商品清单所含信息的科学有效性。为CG开发和更新的程序和时间创建了分步算法;上述文件详细阐述了对CG结构的要求、所含信息的内容和科学有效性。还对《指南》各部分的编写和设计(标题页、目录、缩略语、术语和定义清单、关于疾病的简要信息、诊断、治疗、医疗康复、预防和后续护理、医疗组织、补充信息、评估医疗质量的标准、参考文献清单、制定和修订《指南》工作组的组成)提出了评论。CG的开发方法、参考材料、医生行动的算法、患者信息、评估量表、问卷调查和其他患者评估工具)。最近通过的CG注册要求与监管机构以前的方法建议进行了比较。讨论。在更新的CG中统一治疗策略和使用循证推理将提高医疗保健的质量,并对医疗保险部门和司法判决产生积极影响。然而,提出的CG概念引起了医学界代表和医疗律师的一些批评意见。例如,更新后的监管法案没有规定更新CG的截止日期和算法;这些行为不涉及各种医疗非营利组织之间的协调,尽管这种协调是避免工作重复所必需的;这些行为没有决定CG开发所需的特定资源(后者的缺陷可能会对最终CG的质量和时间产生负面影响)。一些专家认为,实行所谓的GRADE制度是可取的。此外,鉴于CG并非规范性法律文件,分析了可能存在的法律风险。结论。CG更新和批准程序的定期改进是这一大规模过程的组成部分,该过程引入了监管框架和临床实践的变化。强制遵守CG是当今高质量医疗保健的应有因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信