Interim Report on a Live Review of Systematic Reviews of Natural Health Products and Natural Therapies in the Prevention and/or Treatment of COVID-19

CAND Journal Pub Date : 2023-03-30 DOI:10.54434/candj.136
I. Lloyd, K. Cooley, Daniella Remy
{"title":"Interim Report on a Live Review of Systematic Reviews of Natural Health Products and Natural Therapies in the Prevention and/or Treatment of COVID-19","authors":"I. Lloyd, K. Cooley, Daniella Remy","doi":"10.54434/candj.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This living review of systematic reviews investigates the types and volume of research pertaining to natural health products and therapies as they relate to the prevention and/or treatment of COVID-19 and post-COVID syndrome.\nMethods: A monthly search for published peer-reviewed systematic reviews of the topic was initiated May 2022 and is ongoing. Using a systematic keyword search strategy with clear inclusion and exclusion criteria, a summary of the types of studies included, the overall outcome and treatment focus were assessed.\nResults: A total of 225 systematic reviews encompassing 5,636 studies of randomized controlled trials (49.8%, n=112), observational studies (21.3%, n=48), clinical studies (20.4%, n=46), and other studies (12%, n=27) were included. Of those, 28.9% (n=65) of the systematic reviews focused on prevention, 67.6% (n=152) on treatment, and 3.1% (n=8) on post-COVID. The natural health products reviewed included herbal medicine, vitamins, minerals, other natural health products, and other therapies, with 83.5% (n=188) of all systematic reviews stating a positive outcome and beneficial  potential of the natural treatment or therapy investigated.\nConclusion: This living systematic review concludes that there is a growing interest in research pertaining to natural health products and therapies with respect to the prevention of COVID-19 infections and addressing disease severity and mortality, especially in adjunct to conventional medical intervention. Nonetheless, there is a lack of high-quality evidence and consistency in outcome reporting across the large breadth of natural treatment and management options.","PeriodicalId":444026,"journal":{"name":"CAND Journal","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAND Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54434/candj.136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This living review of systematic reviews investigates the types and volume of research pertaining to natural health products and therapies as they relate to the prevention and/or treatment of COVID-19 and post-COVID syndrome. Methods: A monthly search for published peer-reviewed systematic reviews of the topic was initiated May 2022 and is ongoing. Using a systematic keyword search strategy with clear inclusion and exclusion criteria, a summary of the types of studies included, the overall outcome and treatment focus were assessed. Results: A total of 225 systematic reviews encompassing 5,636 studies of randomized controlled trials (49.8%, n=112), observational studies (21.3%, n=48), clinical studies (20.4%, n=46), and other studies (12%, n=27) were included. Of those, 28.9% (n=65) of the systematic reviews focused on prevention, 67.6% (n=152) on treatment, and 3.1% (n=8) on post-COVID. The natural health products reviewed included herbal medicine, vitamins, minerals, other natural health products, and other therapies, with 83.5% (n=188) of all systematic reviews stating a positive outcome and beneficial  potential of the natural treatment or therapy investigated. Conclusion: This living systematic review concludes that there is a growing interest in research pertaining to natural health products and therapies with respect to the prevention of COVID-19 infections and addressing disease severity and mortality, especially in adjunct to conventional medical intervention. Nonetheless, there is a lack of high-quality evidence and consistency in outcome reporting across the large breadth of natural treatment and management options.
关于预防和/或治疗COVID-19的天然保健品和自然疗法系统评价现场审查的中期报告
目的:本系统综述调查了与预防和/或治疗COVID-19和后COVID-19综合征相关的天然保健产品和疗法的研究类型和数量。方法:从2022年5月开始每月检索已发表的同行评议的系统评论,目前仍在进行中。采用系统的关键词搜索策略,明确纳入和排除标准,总结纳入的研究类型,评估总体结果和治疗重点。结果:共纳入225项系统评价,包括随机对照试验(49.8%,n=112)、观察性研究(21.3%,n=48)、临床研究(20.4%,n=46)和其他研究(12%,n=27)的5636项研究。其中,28.9% (n=65)的系统评价侧重于预防,67.6% (n=152)侧重于治疗,3.1% (n=8)侧重于covid后。所审查的天然保健产品包括草药、维生素、矿物质、其他天然保健产品和其他疗法,83.5% (n=188)的系统评价报告了积极的结果和所调查的自然治疗或疗法的有益潜力。结论:这篇生动的系统综述得出结论,人们对与预防COVID-19感染和解决疾病严重程度和死亡率有关的天然保健产品和疗法的研究越来越感兴趣,特别是在常规医疗干预的辅助下。然而,在广泛的自然治疗和管理方案中,缺乏高质量的证据和一致性的结果报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信