Artificial Intelligence and the Myth of Objectivity

R. Pathni
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence and the Myth of Objectivity","authors":"R. Pathni","doi":"10.4018/jhms.329234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) is being rapidly integrated into healthcare with a naïve belief in the objectivity of AI and a complacent trust in the omniscience of computational knowledge. While AI has the potential to transform healthcare, there are significant ethical and safety concerns. The pace of AI development and the race for AI supremacy is leading to a rapid, and largely unregulated, proliferation of AI applications. It is important to understand that AI technologies bring new and accelerated risks and need meaningful human control and oversight. However, standards and regulation in the field are at a very nascent stage and need urgent attention. This paper explores the issues related to reliability, transparency, bias, and ethics to illustrate the ground realities and makes a case for developing standards and regulatory frameworks for the safe, effective, and ethical use of AI in healthcare.","PeriodicalId":256559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management Standards","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jhms.329234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is being rapidly integrated into healthcare with a naïve belief in the objectivity of AI and a complacent trust in the omniscience of computational knowledge. While AI has the potential to transform healthcare, there are significant ethical and safety concerns. The pace of AI development and the race for AI supremacy is leading to a rapid, and largely unregulated, proliferation of AI applications. It is important to understand that AI technologies bring new and accelerated risks and need meaningful human control and oversight. However, standards and regulation in the field are at a very nascent stage and need urgent attention. This paper explores the issues related to reliability, transparency, bias, and ethics to illustrate the ground realities and makes a case for developing standards and regulatory frameworks for the safe, effective, and ethical use of AI in healthcare.
人工智能与客观性的神话
人工智能(AI)正迅速融入医疗保健领域,人们对人工智能的客观性抱有naïve的信念,并对计算知识的无所不知感到自满。虽然人工智能有可能改变医疗保健,但存在重大的道德和安全问题。人工智能的发展速度和对人工智能霸主地位的争夺正在导致人工智能应用的迅速扩散,而且在很大程度上不受监管。重要的是要认识到,人工智能技术带来了新的和加速的风险,需要有意义的人类控制和监督。然而,该领域的标准和法规尚处于起步阶段,需要迫切关注。本文探讨了与可靠性、透明度、偏见和道德相关的问题,以说明基本现实,并为在医疗保健中安全、有效和道德地使用人工智能制定标准和监管框架提供了案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信