Is the Electoral College the Fundamental Problem?

F. Furstenberg
{"title":"Is the Electoral College the Fundamental Problem?","authors":"F. Furstenberg","doi":"10.2307/J.CTV1NC6RCB.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter asks how the constitutional debates over the admission of new states affected the balance of power among the states in general and the election of the presidency in particular. It frames what it calls “The Problem of New States,” and explores how early texts on U.S. western policy of the 1780s framed questions of territory and statehood. It then explores in detail the debates surrounding new state admissions and the Northwest Ordinance in the Constitutional Convention, showing how contingent the final outcome of the Electoral College was, and how questions like the equal footing of states, which have often been taken as settled constitutional issues, were in fact matters of contentious debate. It concludes by tracing paths forward for future research.","PeriodicalId":315083,"journal":{"name":"Political Thought and the Origins of the American Presidency","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Thought and the Origins of the American Presidency","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/J.CTV1NC6RCB.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter asks how the constitutional debates over the admission of new states affected the balance of power among the states in general and the election of the presidency in particular. It frames what it calls “The Problem of New States,” and explores how early texts on U.S. western policy of the 1780s framed questions of territory and statehood. It then explores in detail the debates surrounding new state admissions and the Northwest Ordinance in the Constitutional Convention, showing how contingent the final outcome of the Electoral College was, and how questions like the equal footing of states, which have often been taken as settled constitutional issues, were in fact matters of contentious debate. It concludes by tracing paths forward for future research.
选举团制度是根本问题吗?
本章探讨关于接纳新州的宪法辩论如何影响各州之间的权力平衡,特别是总统选举。它提出了所谓的“新州问题”,并探讨了18世纪80年代关于美国西部政策的早期文本是如何提出领土和国家地位问题的。然后,它详细探讨了围绕新州招生和宪法会议西北条例的辩论,展示了选举团的最终结果是多么偶然,以及如何像州的平等地位这样的问题,这些问题通常被视为解决的宪法问题,实际上是有争议的辩论问题。最后,它为未来的研究找到了前进的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信