Comparison of Wright scale and European scale peak flow meters with digital spirometer

M. Goyal, Goel Ak, Pradeep Kumar, S. Bhattacharya, M. Bajpai, N. Verma, S. Tiwari, S. Kant
{"title":"Comparison of Wright scale and European scale peak flow meters with digital spirometer","authors":"M. Goyal, Goel Ak, Pradeep Kumar, S. Bhattacharya, M. Bajpai, N. Verma, S. Tiwari, S. Kant","doi":"10.5580/23a4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring has been in use to measure airflow obstruction in patients with asthma. Most of the peak flow meter uses a traditional Wright scale to record PEF whilst after 2004 Peak flow meters with new European scale have been introduced. This study was done to assess the limits of agreement of PEF values measured with mini Wright's peak flow meter (Wright scale) or with new European scale with digital spirometer. Material and Methods: 582 healthy volunteers between the age group of 18-40 years were recruited for this study. PEF was measured with mini wright's peak flow meter with traditional wright scale and new EU PEF scale. Simultaneously Spirometery of each subject was performed with Sprobank G and FVC, FEV1, FEV1%, PEF were recorded. Results: PEF measured with wrights scale and new European scale both shows high and similar levels of correlation with digital spirometer (r=0.765 and 0.767). Despite a high correlation observed between measured PEF with different instruments, the limits of agreement are not acceptable for either of the scales. Conclusion: The measurement of PEFR with New European scale does not seem to provide any significant advantage over traditional scale.","PeriodicalId":284620,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/23a4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring has been in use to measure airflow obstruction in patients with asthma. Most of the peak flow meter uses a traditional Wright scale to record PEF whilst after 2004 Peak flow meters with new European scale have been introduced. This study was done to assess the limits of agreement of PEF values measured with mini Wright's peak flow meter (Wright scale) or with new European scale with digital spirometer. Material and Methods: 582 healthy volunteers between the age group of 18-40 years were recruited for this study. PEF was measured with mini wright's peak flow meter with traditional wright scale and new EU PEF scale. Simultaneously Spirometery of each subject was performed with Sprobank G and FVC, FEV1, FEV1%, PEF were recorded. Results: PEF measured with wrights scale and new European scale both shows high and similar levels of correlation with digital spirometer (r=0.765 and 0.767). Despite a high correlation observed between measured PEF with different instruments, the limits of agreement are not acceptable for either of the scales. Conclusion: The measurement of PEFR with New European scale does not seem to provide any significant advantage over traditional scale.
赖特刻度与欧洲刻度带数字肺活量计峰值流量计的比较
呼气峰流量(PEF)监测已被用于测量哮喘患者的气流阻塞。大多数峰值流量计使用传统的赖特刻度来记录PEF,而在2004年之后,引入了新的欧洲刻度的峰值流量计。本研究的目的是评估微型赖特峰值流量计(赖特量表)或新型欧洲数字肺活量计测量PEF值的一致性。材料与方法:本研究招募年龄在18-40岁之间的健康志愿者582人。采用微型莱特峰值流量计,采用传统莱特标度和新型欧盟PEF标度测量PEF。同时用Sprobank G测定各受试者的肺活量,记录FVC、FEV1、FEV1%、PEF。结果:wright量表和new European量表测得的PEF与数字肺活量计的相关性均较高且相近(r=0.765和0.767)。尽管在不同仪器测量的PEF之间观察到高度的相关性,但对于任何一个尺度,一致性的限制都是不可接受的。结论:新欧洲量表测量PEFR与传统量表相比似乎没有明显优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信