Relations of Knowledge with Perceptions of Eligible Men About Vasectomy in Angsau Primary Health Care, Tanah Laut, South Kalimantan

Natasha Bharat Sindunata Sindunata, Laili Wahyuni, Androniko Setiawan
{"title":"Relations of Knowledge with Perceptions of Eligible Men About Vasectomy in Angsau Primary Health Care, Tanah Laut, South Kalimantan","authors":"Natasha Bharat Sindunata Sindunata, Laili Wahyuni, Androniko Setiawan","doi":"10.20473/iabj.v2i2.164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Indonesia’s Maternal Mortality Rate (MMR) in 2015 was still high around 305 over 100.000 population. South Kalimantan MMR’s in 2018 increase to 108 over 100.000 population. If not handled properly the increasing of MMR, it  will not achieve the SDG's by 2030. The high MMR is caused by the large number of pregnancies and deliveries in Indonesia. One of the ways to prevent it, is by reducing the number of pregnancies and one of the most effective way is through the Family Planning (FP) program. Vasectomy is a method of operative contraception in men. Public perception of vasectomy is a complicated operation, so vasectomy is not an option.\nAim: Knowing the relations between knowledge and perceptions of eligible men on vasectomy\nMethod: This research is an analytical survey with a cross sectional approach. The number of subjects used as many as 80 respondents who meet the feasibility of being included in this study. The chi-square test with a significance level of p<0.05 was used for statistical analysis. Knowledge is considered good if it has a total score of more than 76 percent, and it is considered poor if it is less than equal to 76 percent. Positive perception if the respondent's mean score is less than the T score, and to be negative perception if the respondent's mean score is more than the T score.\nResults: A total of 108 respondents were included in this study. There are 89 respondents or 82% who have good knowledge and 19 respondents or 18% who have bad knowledge about vasectomy. Negative perceptions were owned by 81 respondents or 75% while positive perceptions were only found in 27 respondents or 25%. Chi-square analysis showed that there was a significant relation between poor knowledge and negative perceptions with p<0.05.\nConclusion: Poor knowledge of vasectomy is associated with negative perceptions. This study shows lack of public knowledge about vasectomy, causing a negative stigma about vasectomy.","PeriodicalId":385352,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Andrology and Biomedical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Andrology and Biomedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/iabj.v2i2.164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Indonesia’s Maternal Mortality Rate (MMR) in 2015 was still high around 305 over 100.000 population. South Kalimantan MMR’s in 2018 increase to 108 over 100.000 population. If not handled properly the increasing of MMR, it  will not achieve the SDG's by 2030. The high MMR is caused by the large number of pregnancies and deliveries in Indonesia. One of the ways to prevent it, is by reducing the number of pregnancies and one of the most effective way is through the Family Planning (FP) program. Vasectomy is a method of operative contraception in men. Public perception of vasectomy is a complicated operation, so vasectomy is not an option. Aim: Knowing the relations between knowledge and perceptions of eligible men on vasectomy Method: This research is an analytical survey with a cross sectional approach. The number of subjects used as many as 80 respondents who meet the feasibility of being included in this study. The chi-square test with a significance level of p<0.05 was used for statistical analysis. Knowledge is considered good if it has a total score of more than 76 percent, and it is considered poor if it is less than equal to 76 percent. Positive perception if the respondent's mean score is less than the T score, and to be negative perception if the respondent's mean score is more than the T score. Results: A total of 108 respondents were included in this study. There are 89 respondents or 82% who have good knowledge and 19 respondents or 18% who have bad knowledge about vasectomy. Negative perceptions were owned by 81 respondents or 75% while positive perceptions were only found in 27 respondents or 25%. Chi-square analysis showed that there was a significant relation between poor knowledge and negative perceptions with p<0.05. Conclusion: Poor knowledge of vasectomy is associated with negative perceptions. This study shows lack of public knowledge about vasectomy, causing a negative stigma about vasectomy.
在南加里曼丹的Angsau初级卫生保健,Tanah Laut,合格男性对输精管切除术的认识与认知的关系
背景:2015年印度尼西亚的孕产妇死亡率(MMR)仍然很高,每10万人中约有305人死亡。2018年,南加里曼丹的MMR增加到108个,人口超过10万。如果不妥善处理孕产妇死亡率上升的问题,到2030年将无法实现可持续发展目标。产妇死亡率高是由印度尼西亚的大量怀孕和分娩造成的。预防它的方法之一是减少怀孕次数,最有效的方法之一是通过计划生育(FP)项目。输精管切除术是男性手术避孕的一种方法。公众认为输精管结扎术是一项复杂的手术,因此输精管结扎术不是一种选择。目的:了解男性对输精管结扎的认知与认知之间的关系。方法:本研究采用横断面方法进行分析性调查。被试人数采用了多达80名符合被纳入本研究可行性的被调查者。采用显著性水平p<0.05的卡方检验进行统计学分析。总分超过76%的知识被认为是好的,低于76%的知识被认为是差的。如果被调查者的平均得分小于T分,则为积极感知;如果被调查者的平均得分大于T分,则为消极感知。结果:本研究共纳入108名调查对象。对输精管结扎有良好认识的有89人(82%),不了解的有19人(18%)。81名受访者(占75%)持负面看法,而只有27名受访者(占25%)持正面看法。卡方分析显示,知识贫乏与负面认知之间存在显著相关,p<0.05。结论:对输精管结扎术的认识不足与对输精管结扎术的负面认知有关。本研究显示公众对输精管切除术缺乏了解,导致对输精管切除术的负面污名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信