Increasing Stability of Real-Time Pulse Wave Velocity Estimation by Combining Established and New Approaches

M. Bachler, C. Mayer, B. Hametner, S. Wassertheurer
{"title":"Increasing Stability of Real-Time Pulse Wave Velocity Estimation by Combining Established and New Approaches","authors":"M. Bachler, C. Mayer, B. Hametner, S. Wassertheurer","doi":"10.1109/EUROSIM.2013.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pulse wave velocity (PWV) in arteries is an estimator for arterial stiffness. As velocity is calculated as distance per time, the accuracy and reliability of PWV measurements depends heavily on the estimation of the pulse transit time (PTT). Several methods for the estimation of the PTT exist, often resulting in different PWV values. They rely on the exact determination of specific points in the pulse wave, which are easily affected by small changes of the signal. As there is still no agreement on the accuracy of these methods, only the reliability and stability of these commonly used \"foot-to-foot\" algorithms are compared in this paper. These algorithms are based on the detection of the diastole-minimum, the maximum of the first or second derivative or combinations thereof. We also adapted a new approach called \"diastole-patching\" based on the matching of a specific region of the pulse waves. The methods were tested using 2348 pulse waves from the MIMIC Database, collected from 46 subjects. Intra-subject deviation and relative outliers per subject were lowest in the adapted diastole-patching algorithm (4.9 ± 3ms and 0.6 ± 2.7%, respectively). Therefore, this study has shown that the diastole-patching method is the most stable and reliable of the algorithms under investigation.","PeriodicalId":386945,"journal":{"name":"2013 8th EUROSIM Congress on Modelling and Simulation","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 8th EUROSIM Congress on Modelling and Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EUROSIM.2013.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Pulse wave velocity (PWV) in arteries is an estimator for arterial stiffness. As velocity is calculated as distance per time, the accuracy and reliability of PWV measurements depends heavily on the estimation of the pulse transit time (PTT). Several methods for the estimation of the PTT exist, often resulting in different PWV values. They rely on the exact determination of specific points in the pulse wave, which are easily affected by small changes of the signal. As there is still no agreement on the accuracy of these methods, only the reliability and stability of these commonly used "foot-to-foot" algorithms are compared in this paper. These algorithms are based on the detection of the diastole-minimum, the maximum of the first or second derivative or combinations thereof. We also adapted a new approach called "diastole-patching" based on the matching of a specific region of the pulse waves. The methods were tested using 2348 pulse waves from the MIMIC Database, collected from 46 subjects. Intra-subject deviation and relative outliers per subject were lowest in the adapted diastole-patching algorithm (4.9 ± 3ms and 0.6 ± 2.7%, respectively). Therefore, this study has shown that the diastole-patching method is the most stable and reliable of the algorithms under investigation.
结合现有方法和新方法提高实时脉冲波速估计的稳定性
动脉脉波速度(PWV)是动脉刚度的一种估计。由于速度是按距离/时间计算的,因此PWV测量的准确性和可靠性在很大程度上取决于脉冲传递时间(PTT)的估计。有几种估计PTT的方法,通常会得到不同的PWV值。它们依赖于脉冲波中特定点的精确测定,这些点很容易受到信号微小变化的影响。由于对这些方法的精度尚无定论,本文仅比较了这些常用的“foot-to-foot”算法的可靠性和稳定性。这些算法基于舒张最小值、一阶导数或二阶导数的最大值或其组合的检测。我们还采用了一种名为“舒张修补”的新方法,该方法基于脉搏波的特定区域的匹配。这些方法使用来自MIMIC数据库的2348个脉冲波进行测试,这些脉冲波来自46名受试者。适应舒张舒张补片算法的受试者内偏差和每位受试者的相对异常值最低(分别为4.9±3ms和0.6±2.7%)。因此,本研究表明,舒张舒张修补方法是所研究的算法中最稳定和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信