Causality and clinical medicine: Using fuzzy measures for patient prediction and experimental design

C. Helgason, T. Jobe
{"title":"Causality and clinical medicine: Using fuzzy measures for patient prediction and experimental design","authors":"C. Helgason, T. Jobe","doi":"10.1109/NAFIPS.2008.4531320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Scientific medicine regards causality in terms of conditions of chance, and expressed in probabilities. The large double blind controlled randomized trial and Bayes' theorem are the foundation of Evidence Based Medicine. Evidence -Based Medicine has the purpose of bringing science to the bedside. Comparison between experimental subjects or real patients and the average patient of a group study requires uniform conditions.Probability theory satisfies this requirement. Methods: The fundamental concept of fuzzy subset hood and measure space of fuzzy theory allow for the comparison of subjects or patients without the requirement of uniform conditions. The fuzzy measure of breaking of symmetry of conditions, K, allows for measures of fuzzy similarity, comparison, prediction to be made between two fuzzy sets as points while accounting for different conditions. Results: Using the fuzzy measure of prediction , F Pred (A,B) , it is possible to precisely compare a clinical patient to the average patient of any large group study, and in addition, with fuzzy entropy it is possible to carry out experiments where test and control groups are compared. Conclusion: The scientific requirement of uniform conditions for each repetition of an experiment is no longer a necessity for the comparison of patients or groups of patients. This is because fuzzy measures of symmetry breaking and similarity can account for any difference between patients due to different conditions. Fuzzy entropy can then measure the difference between two groups of patients in the experimental setting.","PeriodicalId":430770,"journal":{"name":"NAFIPS 2008 - 2008 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAFIPS 2008 - 2008 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAFIPS.2008.4531320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Scientific medicine regards causality in terms of conditions of chance, and expressed in probabilities. The large double blind controlled randomized trial and Bayes' theorem are the foundation of Evidence Based Medicine. Evidence -Based Medicine has the purpose of bringing science to the bedside. Comparison between experimental subjects or real patients and the average patient of a group study requires uniform conditions.Probability theory satisfies this requirement. Methods: The fundamental concept of fuzzy subset hood and measure space of fuzzy theory allow for the comparison of subjects or patients without the requirement of uniform conditions. The fuzzy measure of breaking of symmetry of conditions, K, allows for measures of fuzzy similarity, comparison, prediction to be made between two fuzzy sets as points while accounting for different conditions. Results: Using the fuzzy measure of prediction , F Pred (A,B) , it is possible to precisely compare a clinical patient to the average patient of any large group study, and in addition, with fuzzy entropy it is possible to carry out experiments where test and control groups are compared. Conclusion: The scientific requirement of uniform conditions for each repetition of an experiment is no longer a necessity for the comparison of patients or groups of patients. This is because fuzzy measures of symmetry breaking and similarity can account for any difference between patients due to different conditions. Fuzzy entropy can then measure the difference between two groups of patients in the experimental setting.
因果关系与临床医学:使用模糊测量进行患者预测和实验设计
背景:科学医学从偶然性的角度看待因果关系,用概率来表达。大型双盲对照随机试验和贝叶斯定理是循证医学的基础。循证医学的目的是将科学带到床边。实验对象或真实患者与群体研究中的普通患者之间的比较需要统一的条件。概率论满足这个要求。方法:模糊理论的基本概念模糊子集和测量空间允许在不要求统一条件的情况下对受试者或患者进行比较。条件对称性破坏的模糊度量K允许在考虑不同条件的情况下,在两个模糊集之间作为点进行模糊相似性、比较和预测度量。结果:使用预测的模糊度量F Pred (A,B),可以精确地将临床患者与任何大群体研究的平均患者进行比较,此外,使用模糊熵可以进行比较实验组和对照组的实验。结论:每次重复实验的统一条件的科学要求不再是患者或患者组比较的必要条件。这是因为对对称性破坏和相似性的模糊测量可以解释由于不同条件而导致的患者之间的任何差异。然后,模糊熵可以在实验环境中测量两组患者之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信