Periodic health examinations during a pandemic

J. Janus, Daria Kołton, Nikoletta Kępowicz, Magdalena Kobos, B. Jurkiewicz
{"title":"Periodic health examinations during a pandemic","authors":"J. Janus, Daria Kołton, Nikoletta Kępowicz, Magdalena Kobos, B. Jurkiewicz","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.3311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The coronavirus pandemic has changed daily lives. These changes affect many aspects of lives including periodic health examinations. Specialists warn that in the era of the pandemic people abandon examinations. This is a very dangerous phenomenon, which can negatively affect health and general well-being. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of periodic health examinations during the pandemic period including the use of telephone advice services.\nMaterial and methods: The study was carried out in March 2021 among 147 people (120 women and 27 men), in the age range of 18-76 years. The study was carried out by the method of diagnostic survey, with the use of questionnaire technique (authors’ questionnaire). Questions included knowledge of prevention, frequency of periodic health examinations, and health services received by the respondents during the pandemic. Analysis of the survey results provided information on current health problems, time of diagnosis, and course of treatment to date.\nResults: During the pandemic, the majority of respondents had the opportunity to use a telephone advice, with women more likely to use the telephone advice than men (64.2% vs. 37.0%; p = 0.010). 36.9% of the respondents were satisfied with the service. The main reasons for dissatisfaction with the telephone advice included: inability to examine (33.3%), short telephone advice time (24.2%), misdiagnosis or ineffective treatment (21.2%), long waiting time, difficult contact with the facility (15.2%). Among telephone advice users, 39.1% had chronic diseases; among non- telephone advice users, the percentage was lower at 18.3%. Telephone advice users were significantly\nless likely to say they did not have periodic health examinations or did not remember when they had them done compared to non- telephone dvice users (p = 0.019). \nConclusions: During the pandemic, the majority of respondents had the opportunity to use telephone advice. Only 1/3 were satisfied with the telephone advice, and the main reasons for dissatisfaction were as follows: inability to examine, short telephone advice time, misdiagnosis or ineffective treatment. Telephone advice users were significantly less likely to say they did not have periodic examinations or could not remember when they had them done compared to non-telephone advice users.\n\n","PeriodicalId":419847,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion & Physical Activity","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion & Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.3311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus pandemic has changed daily lives. These changes affect many aspects of lives including periodic health examinations. Specialists warn that in the era of the pandemic people abandon examinations. This is a very dangerous phenomenon, which can negatively affect health and general well-being. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of periodic health examinations during the pandemic period including the use of telephone advice services. Material and methods: The study was carried out in March 2021 among 147 people (120 women and 27 men), in the age range of 18-76 years. The study was carried out by the method of diagnostic survey, with the use of questionnaire technique (authors’ questionnaire). Questions included knowledge of prevention, frequency of periodic health examinations, and health services received by the respondents during the pandemic. Analysis of the survey results provided information on current health problems, time of diagnosis, and course of treatment to date. Results: During the pandemic, the majority of respondents had the opportunity to use a telephone advice, with women more likely to use the telephone advice than men (64.2% vs. 37.0%; p = 0.010). 36.9% of the respondents were satisfied with the service. The main reasons for dissatisfaction with the telephone advice included: inability to examine (33.3%), short telephone advice time (24.2%), misdiagnosis or ineffective treatment (21.2%), long waiting time, difficult contact with the facility (15.2%). Among telephone advice users, 39.1% had chronic diseases; among non- telephone advice users, the percentage was lower at 18.3%. Telephone advice users were significantly less likely to say they did not have periodic health examinations or did not remember when they had them done compared to non- telephone dvice users (p = 0.019). Conclusions: During the pandemic, the majority of respondents had the opportunity to use telephone advice. Only 1/3 were satisfied with the telephone advice, and the main reasons for dissatisfaction were as follows: inability to examine, short telephone advice time, misdiagnosis or ineffective treatment. Telephone advice users were significantly less likely to say they did not have periodic examinations or could not remember when they had them done compared to non-telephone advice users.
大流行期间的定期健康检查
新冠肺炎疫情改变了人们的日常生活。这些变化影响生活的许多方面,包括定期健康检查。专家警告说,在大流行时代,人们放弃了检查。这是一种非常危险的现象,会对健康和总体福祉产生负面影响。这项研究的目的是确定大流行期间定期健康检查的频率,包括电话咨询服务的使用情况。材料和方法:该研究于2021年3月在147人(120名女性和27名男性)中进行,年龄在18-76岁之间。本研究采用诊断调查法,采用问卷调查技术(作者问卷)。问题包括预防知识、定期健康检查的频率以及答复者在大流行期间获得的保健服务。对调查结果的分析提供了有关目前健康问题、诊断时间和迄今为止治疗过程的信息。结果:在大流行期间,大多数答复者有机会使用电话咨询,妇女比男子更有可能使用电话咨询(64.2%对37.0%;P = 0.010)。36.9%的受访者对服务感到满意。对电话咨询不满意的主要原因包括:无法检查(33.3%)、电话咨询时间短(24.2%)、误诊或治疗无效(21.2%)、等待时间长、与机构联系困难(15.2%)。在电话咨询用户中,39.1%患有慢性病;在非电话咨询用户中,这一比例较低,为18.3%。与不使用电话咨询的人相比,使用电话咨询的人不太可能说他们没有定期进行健康检查或不记得他们什么时候做过健康检查(p = 0.019)。结论:在大流行期间,大多数答复者有机会使用电话咨询。只有1/3的人对电话咨询满意,不满意的主要原因为:无法检查、电话咨询时间短、误诊或治疗无效。与不使用电话咨询的人相比,使用电话咨询的人不太可能说他们没有定期检查或不记得什么时候做过检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信