The Impacts of Favorableness of Job Conditions on Organizational Silence of Care Workers : Focusing on the Multiple Mediating Effects of Communication Types

Sun-Young Lee, Seok Cheol Ha
{"title":"The Impacts of Favorableness of Job Conditions on Organizational Silence of Care Workers : Focusing on the Multiple Mediating Effects of Communication Types","authors":"Sun-Young Lee, Seok Cheol Ha","doi":"10.22589/kaocm.2022.44.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between favorableness of job conditions and organizational silence, and to examine the mediating effects of communication types on the relationships. For this study, a sample of 222 care workers working in Daegu was collected and analyzed. Frequency analyses, basic statistical analyses, and correlation analyses were used by the SPSS version 25.0, and parallel multiple mediation model was analyzed by the PROCESS Macro version 3.5. Also, bootstrapping was used for significance tests. Results showed that favorableness of job conditions didn't have a direct impact on organizational silence. In multiple mediation analyses, open communication between upper and lower parties involved as well as cooperative communication between workers had full mediating impacts on the relationships between favorableness of job conditions and organizational silence. However, the communication for quality of information didn't have mediating impacts. Based on these findings, this study discusses policy and practical implications to promote favorableness of job conditions and to decrease organizational silence.","PeriodicalId":127751,"journal":{"name":"Korea Academy of Care Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea Academy of Care Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22589/kaocm.2022.44.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between favorableness of job conditions and organizational silence, and to examine the mediating effects of communication types on the relationships. For this study, a sample of 222 care workers working in Daegu was collected and analyzed. Frequency analyses, basic statistical analyses, and correlation analyses were used by the SPSS version 25.0, and parallel multiple mediation model was analyzed by the PROCESS Macro version 3.5. Also, bootstrapping was used for significance tests. Results showed that favorableness of job conditions didn't have a direct impact on organizational silence. In multiple mediation analyses, open communication between upper and lower parties involved as well as cooperative communication between workers had full mediating impacts on the relationships between favorableness of job conditions and organizational silence. However, the communication for quality of information didn't have mediating impacts. Based on these findings, this study discusses policy and practical implications to promote favorableness of job conditions and to decrease organizational silence.
工作条件有利性对护理工作者组织沉默的影响:基于沟通类型的多重中介效应
本研究的目的是探讨工作条件有利性与组织沉默之间的关系,并检验沟通类型对这种关系的中介作用。本研究以222名在大邱工作的护理人员为样本进行分析。采用SPSS 25.0版进行频率分析、基础统计分析和相关分析,采用PROCESS Macro 3.5版进行并行多重中介模型分析。此外,bootstrapping被用于显著性检验。结果表明,良好的工作条件对组织沉默没有直接影响。在多重中介分析中,上下级当事人之间的开放式沟通和员工之间的合作性沟通对工作条件有利性与组织沉默的关系具有充分的中介作用。然而,沟通对信息质量没有中介作用。在此基础上,本研究探讨了促进有利工作条件和减少组织沉默的政策和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信