Agglomeration, Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Governance

Anthony Howell
{"title":"Agglomeration, Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Governance","authors":"Anthony Howell","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3569048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers the role of firm ownership structure, absorptive capac-ity and agglomeration on firm innovation in the Chinese context. A popular co-occurrence measure is used to measure local spillovers expected to take place between similar but different industries co-located together. Relying on a large panel of Chinese firms, this paper offers three main results: (i) privately-owned enterprises (POEs) are more efficient innovators than their state-owned enter-prise (SOE) counterparts; (ii) local spillovers from related industries enhance firm innovation, especially for firms with higher pre-existing learning abilities; and (iii) despite possessing relatively high levels of absorptive capacity, POEs maintain higher innovation performance compared to their SOE counterparts. These findings help confirm the absorptive capacity thesis, but also suggest that possessing relatively higher levels of absorptive capacity, in and of itself, is not always a sufficient pre-condition for firms to overcome all of the cognitive and technological barriers to leveraging external sources of knowledge. In line with theories of knowledge governance, one explanation for this finding is that private (government) operators develop higher (lower) quality governance procedures that ultimately enhance (hamper) their ability to successfully integrate external sources of knowledge even after developing a high level of absorptive capabilities.","PeriodicalId":416291,"journal":{"name":"IO: Firm Structure","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Firm Structure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3569048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper considers the role of firm ownership structure, absorptive capac-ity and agglomeration on firm innovation in the Chinese context. A popular co-occurrence measure is used to measure local spillovers expected to take place between similar but different industries co-located together. Relying on a large panel of Chinese firms, this paper offers three main results: (i) privately-owned enterprises (POEs) are more efficient innovators than their state-owned enter-prise (SOE) counterparts; (ii) local spillovers from related industries enhance firm innovation, especially for firms with higher pre-existing learning abilities; and (iii) despite possessing relatively high levels of absorptive capacity, POEs maintain higher innovation performance compared to their SOE counterparts. These findings help confirm the absorptive capacity thesis, but also suggest that possessing relatively higher levels of absorptive capacity, in and of itself, is not always a sufficient pre-condition for firms to overcome all of the cognitive and technological barriers to leveraging external sources of knowledge. In line with theories of knowledge governance, one explanation for this finding is that private (government) operators develop higher (lower) quality governance procedures that ultimately enhance (hamper) their ability to successfully integrate external sources of knowledge even after developing a high level of absorptive capabilities.
集聚、吸收能力与知识治理
本文在中国背景下考察了企业股权结构、吸收能力和集聚对企业创新的影响。一种流行的共现度量方法被用来衡量在相似但不同的产业共存的情况下可能发生的局部溢出效应。通过对大量中国企业的调查,本文得出了三个主要结论:(i)民营企业(POEs)是比国有企业(SOE)更有效的创新者;(2)相关产业的本地溢出效应会促进企业创新,尤其是对于已有学习能力较高的企业;(3)尽管民营企业具有较高的吸收能力,但其创新绩效仍高于国有企业。这些发现有助于证实吸收能力理论,但也表明,拥有相对较高水平的吸收能力本身并不总是企业克服利用外部知识来源的所有认知和技术障碍的充分前提条件。根据知识治理理论,对这一发现的一种解释是,私营(政府)经营者开发了更高(更低)质量的治理程序,最终增强(阻碍)了他们成功整合外部知识来源的能力,即使在发展了高水平的吸收能力之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信