Choices for Care: Consumer Choice and State Policymaking Courage Amid Medicaid’s Shifting Entitlement to Long‐Term Care

Tracy Bach
{"title":"Choices for Care: Consumer Choice and State Policymaking Courage Amid Medicaid’s Shifting Entitlement to Long‐Term Care","authors":"Tracy Bach","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1443237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Choices for Care: Consumer Choice and State Policymaking Courage Amid Medicaid’s Shifting Entitlement to Long-Term Care, Professor Bach analyzes a leading state program intended to encourage the delivery of care in the home and community, thereby avoiding admission to nursing homes. Choices for Care, Vermont’s Medicaid Demonstraion Waiver program, has clearly enabled more Vermonters to receive health care in their homes. After its first two years, it is seen as a model by other states and the federal government. But Bach questions the results. She argues that CFC is reshaping the landscape of long-term care providers, with resulting industry effects both intended, on nursing homes, and unintended, on home health agencies. Moreover, she observes that the initial success in shifting care away from institutions does not provide a clear answer to the cost trade-off between nursing home and home and community-based care. To date, Vermont has not shown that CFC has solved the overall long-term care spending problem. Likewise, the question of whether expanding home and community-based services for those on the eligibility edge successfully staves off their eventual admission to a nursing home is still an open one. Finally, the demographic question about the home care provider pool underlines the fact that the experience of CFC, as a very small state experiment, might be hard to replicate in other states. In this article, Bach puts the CFC results into the perspective of long-term health care system design.","PeriodicalId":289061,"journal":{"name":"Marquette Elder's Advisor","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marquette Elder's Advisor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1443237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Choices for Care: Consumer Choice and State Policymaking Courage Amid Medicaid’s Shifting Entitlement to Long-Term Care, Professor Bach analyzes a leading state program intended to encourage the delivery of care in the home and community, thereby avoiding admission to nursing homes. Choices for Care, Vermont’s Medicaid Demonstraion Waiver program, has clearly enabled more Vermonters to receive health care in their homes. After its first two years, it is seen as a model by other states and the federal government. But Bach questions the results. She argues that CFC is reshaping the landscape of long-term care providers, with resulting industry effects both intended, on nursing homes, and unintended, on home health agencies. Moreover, she observes that the initial success in shifting care away from institutions does not provide a clear answer to the cost trade-off between nursing home and home and community-based care. To date, Vermont has not shown that CFC has solved the overall long-term care spending problem. Likewise, the question of whether expanding home and community-based services for those on the eligibility edge successfully staves off their eventual admission to a nursing home is still an open one. Finally, the demographic question about the home care provider pool underlines the fact that the experience of CFC, as a very small state experiment, might be hard to replicate in other states. In this article, Bach puts the CFC results into the perspective of long-term health care system design.
护理的选择:消费者的选择和国家决策的勇气在医疗补助转移权利到长期护理
在《护理的选择:在医疗补助计划向长期护理转变的过程中,消费者的选择和国家决策的勇气》一书中,巴赫教授分析了一项主要的州计划,该计划旨在鼓励在家庭和社区提供护理,从而避免进入养老院。“医疗选择”,佛蒙特州的医疗补助示范豁免计划,显然使更多的佛蒙特人能够在家中接受医疗保健。在最初的两年后,它被其他州和联邦政府视为一个典范。但巴赫质疑结果。她认为,CFC正在重塑长期护理提供者的格局,由此产生的行业影响既有对养老院的有意影响,也有对家庭健康机构的无意影响。此外,她观察到,将护理从机构转移出去的初步成功并没有为养老院与家庭和社区护理之间的成本权衡提供明确的答案。到目前为止,佛蒙特州还没有显示出CFC已经解决了整体的长期护理支出问题。同样,为那些处于资格边缘的人扩大家庭和社区服务是否成功地阻止了他们最终进入养老院的问题仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。最后,关于家庭护理提供者群体的人口问题强调了这样一个事实,即CFC的经验,作为一个非常小的州实验,可能很难在其他州复制。在这篇文章中,Bach将CFC的结果放到了长期医疗保健系统设计的角度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信